“…Some studies have indicated that maximum xanthate adsorption occurs at low pH and may be due to the removal of surface oxidation in acidic solutions.1h3 Because the methods used to measure xanthate adsorption in those studies were indirect, namely measuring the amount of xanthate remaining in solution following the treatment of the pyrite, they are more subject to error because xanthate is known to decompose rapidly in solutions of low pH.23,24 Other studies have suggested that xanthate adsorption does not take place in the absence of oxidation products on the pyrite surface.4,6 Studies conducted in this laboratory have indicated that maximum Ñotation of mineral and coal pyrites in the presence of xanthate occurs at low pH, although direct evidence for xanthate adsorption under those conditions was not provided at the time.11 Evidence for xanthate adsorption on mineral pyrites at low pH has been obtained using XPS by monitoring changes in the C 1s, O 1s and S 2p peak envelopes, although it was necessary to cool the XPS sample holder with liquid nitrogen to obtain such evidence. 8,9 While the data in Tables 1, 2 and 4 do not show a direct correlation between the degree of pyrite surface oxidation and the F 1s peak intensity due to the adsorption of the Ñuoroxanthate, it is apparent that adsorption of Ñuoroxanthate is favored on pyrites with the least amount of surface oxidation. There has been general agreement from previous studies of xanthate adsorption onto mineral pyrites that the adsorption of the xanthate, usually in the form of dixanthogen, is facilitated by the presence of oxygen-containing groups on the pyrite surface.1h6,9 Such groups are : adsorbed OH~from the aqueous solutions,5,9 dissolved oxygen from oxygen-containing solutions1h3 or the oxosulfur products of pyrite oxidation such as and S 2 O 8 2Ĩ n this study, no attempt was made to purge S 2 O 7 2~.4,6 oxygen from the xanthate solutions.…”