2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12177-009-9042-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques for accurate protein identification in shotgun proteomic studies of human, mouse, bovine, and chicken lenses

Abstract: Analysis of shotgun proteomics datasets requires techniques to distinguish correct peptide identifications from incorrect identifications, such as linear discriminant functions and target/decoy protein databases. We report an efficient, flexible proteomic analysis workflow pipeline that implements these techniques to control both peptide and protein false discovery rates. We demonstrate its performance by analyzing two-dimensional liquid chromatography separations of lens proteins from human, mouse, bovine, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequest (version 28, revision 12; Thermo Scientific) was used to search MS2 spectra against a May 2014 version of the Sprot human FASTA protein database, with added sequences for E. coli BirA* and HIV-1 strain NL4-3, concatenated sequence-reversed entries to estimate error thresholds, and 179 common contaminant sequences and their reversed forms. The database processing was performed with Python scripts that have been described previously (65). Searches for all samples were performed with trypsin enzyme specificity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sequest (version 28, revision 12; Thermo Scientific) was used to search MS2 spectra against a May 2014 version of the Sprot human FASTA protein database, with added sequences for E. coli BirA* and HIV-1 strain NL4-3, concatenated sequence-reversed entries to estimate error thresholds, and 179 common contaminant sequences and their reversed forms. The database processing was performed with Python scripts that have been described previously (65). Searches for all samples were performed with trypsin enzyme specificity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variable modification of ϩ16 Da on methionine residues was also allowed, with a maximum of 3 modifications per peptide. A linear discriminant transformation was used to improve the identification sensitivity from the SEQUEST analysis (65,66). SEQUEST scores were combined into linear discriminant function scores, and discriminant score histograms were created separately for each peptide charge state (1ϩ, 2ϩ, and 3ϩ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The database processing was performed with python scripts available at http://www.proteomicanalysisworkbench.com. Comet searches for all samples were performed with trypsin enzyme specificity (28,29). Peptide-to-protein mapping and protein filtering were performed using PAW_results_7.py (version 7.0).…”
Section: Analysis Of Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptide-to-protein mapping and protein filtering were performed using PAW_results_6.py (version 6.1). The in-house Python scripts have been described previously (27). The overall probability of protein identification was calculated by dividing the total number of MS/MS spectra matching the protein by the total number of matching MS/MS spectra unique to the protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%