2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10201-015-0457-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques for the practical collection of environmental DNA: filter selection, preservation, and extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
104
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is preferable to filter samples as soon as possible after sampling, and to preserve the filtered material at low temperature; studies have shown filters (and associated DNA) can be stored at -20 o C for later DNA extraction without significant loss of amplifiable DNA (Gilpin et al 2013). Other research suggests the fixation of filtered DNA with ethanol may allow sample material to be preserved at room temperature for many days (Minamoto et al 2012;Thomsen et al 2012a;Minamoto et al 2016). However, since this approach is yet to gain widespread acceptance, its use for the preservation of rare target DNA is not recommended.…”
Section: Extraction Of Dna From Water and Icementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is preferable to filter samples as soon as possible after sampling, and to preserve the filtered material at low temperature; studies have shown filters (and associated DNA) can be stored at -20 o C for later DNA extraction without significant loss of amplifiable DNA (Gilpin et al 2013). Other research suggests the fixation of filtered DNA with ethanol may allow sample material to be preserved at room temperature for many days (Minamoto et al 2012;Thomsen et al 2012a;Minamoto et al 2016). However, since this approach is yet to gain widespread acceptance, its use for the preservation of rare target DNA is not recommended.…”
Section: Extraction Of Dna From Water and Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, it may be preferable to filter multiple small volumes of water through separate filters and later combine the DNA collected from each filter via ethanol precipitation (Santas et al 2013). The optimal filter pore size is generally suggested to lie between 0.6 µm and 1.5 µm (Eichmiller et al 2016;Minamoto et al 2016). We suggest using 1.5 µm glass fibre filters (Type 934-AH) to filter water for assessments of vertebrate DNA but smaller filter sizes (e.g.…”
Section: Extraction Of Dna From Water and Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, various eDNA sample preservation techniques, such as cooling the water samples in a cool box (Takahara et al 2012;Eichmiller et al 2014;Lacoursière-Roussel et al 2016), freezing the water samples (Takahara et al 2015) and on-ice preservation/ethanol fixation/immersion in lysis buffers of obtained filter samples (Goldberg et al 2011;Takahara et al 2012;Renshaw et al 2015;Minamoto et al 2016), have been followed to decelerate the degradation rate of eDNA. However, on-site filtration requires a sophisticated system setup, and cooling or freezing of water and filter samples requires a cool box or portable freezer, resulting in increased equipment requirements for field sampling and an increased contamination risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minamoto, Naka, Moji, and Maruyama (2016) for selection of filter type for eDNA sampling). Minamoto, Naka, Moji, and Maruyama (2016) for selection of filter type for eDNA sampling).…”
Section: Offshore Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%