Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XVII 2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.388360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques to print sub-0.2-μm contact holes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hole size was reduced by more than 150 nm. Aramaki et al [8] have summarized the shrinkage capability of the thermal flow process, RELACS, and CARL as in the range of 20-80, 60-120, and 0-80 nm, respectively. Apparently, our reported technique, Di-RECT, has a wider range.…”
Section: Sub-90-nm Holementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hole size was reduced by more than 150 nm. Aramaki et al [8] have summarized the shrinkage capability of the thermal flow process, RELACS, and CARL as in the range of 20-80, 60-120, and 0-80 nm, respectively. Apparently, our reported technique, Di-RECT, has a wider range.…”
Section: Sub-90-nm Holementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the contact holes are shrunk by photoresist reflow. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The thermal flow process has the advantage of low cost and process simplicity. However, it is difficult to control CDs, because the amount of shrinkage of contact holes is influenced by the pattern layout.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%