2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques Used to Create Continent Catheterizable Channels: A Comparison of Long-term Results in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of the discussed complications varies widely depending on the series, the type of channel used, and the length of follow-up. In general, the incidence of stomal prolapse ranges from 2-5% while stomal incontinence 1-47%, difficulty in catheterization 5-32% and overall rates of surgical revision range from 18-58% [10][11][12][13]. We did not notice any mucosal prolapse and incontinence in our series but two patients (6.6%) had Mitrofanoff stomal stenosis and one patient (3.3%)had Malone stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The incidence of the discussed complications varies widely depending on the series, the type of channel used, and the length of follow-up. In general, the incidence of stomal prolapse ranges from 2-5% while stomal incontinence 1-47%, difficulty in catheterization 5-32% and overall rates of surgical revision range from 18-58% [10][11][12][13]. We did not notice any mucosal prolapse and incontinence in our series but two patients (6.6%) had Mitrofanoff stomal stenosis and one patient (3.3%)had Malone stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The incidence of these complications varies widely based on the series, the type of channel used, and the length of follow-up. In general, the incidence of stomal prolapse ranges from 2-5 %, stomal incontinence 1-47 %, difficulty catheterizing 5-32 % and overall rates of surgical revision range from 18-58 % [19][20][21][22]. We did not notice any mucosal proplase and stomal incontinence in our series but three patients had mitrofanoff stomal stenosis and one patient has Malone stenosis (22%) at one year follow up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Despite all efforts to improve the technique, stomal stenosis remains the most commonly reported complication in the literature, with a stenosis rate ranging from 6 to 39 percent [ 24 ]. However, in many cases, channel dilation or simple endoscopic procedures can be used to manage this conservatively [ 25 ], with complex revisions being sometimes required regardless of the conduct type (appendix, bowel, bladder flap), also taking into account that this type of surgery is aimed at growing bodies with changing pattern of body habits [ 26 , 27 ]. The findings are consistent with our research, which discovered a relatively high rate of complications such as stenosis, recurrent urinary tract infection, incontinence, and bladder stones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%