2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic analysis of fixed-bed chemical looping for decentralized, fuel-cell-grade hydrogen production coupled with a 3 MWth biogas digester

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in the air reactor operation temperature leads to the increase in the Fe 2 O 3 temperature, and more FeO is generated in the fuel reactor, which results in the increase in H 2 production in the steam reactor. Nevertheless, the high operating temperature of the reactors can cause the sintering of the oxygen carrier [ 23 ]. Therefore, the air reactor operation temperature should be less than 1000 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in the air reactor operation temperature leads to the increase in the Fe 2 O 3 temperature, and more FeO is generated in the fuel reactor, which results in the increase in H 2 production in the steam reactor. Nevertheless, the high operating temperature of the reactors can cause the sintering of the oxygen carrier [ 23 ]. Therefore, the air reactor operation temperature should be less than 1000 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isentropic efficiency and mechanical efficiency of the pressure changer (compressor, expander and pump) are 0.80 and 0.90, respectively. RGibbs block is used to model the fuel reactor, steam reactor and air reactor [ 23 ]. Flash, Pump and MHeatX blocks are developed to simulate the flash drum-2, pump and heat recovery steam generator, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of a steam reformer and a fixed-bed chemical looping section within one tubular reactor, which enables concurrent hydrogen production and purification [10]. Thermodynamic simulations showed a process efficiency up to 84% considering optimized heat management [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the TEA result, a process can be evaluated based on specified parameters and assumptions for a multitude of purposes. It had been conducted conventionally over the past two decades for various purposes, ranging from the evaluation of economic factors [i.e., net present value (NPV) (Lubello et al, 2021), payback period (PBP) (Datas et al, 2019), internal rate of return (IRR) (Olszewski et al, 2017;Gönül et al, 2022), return of investment (ROI) (Qian et al, 2014), discounted cash flow rate of return (DFROR) (Phillips et al, 2011), capital cost (Han et al, 2016;Jiang et al, 2020), general costs (Medina-Martos et al, 2020), profit or revenue (Pérez et al, 2021;Wiatrowski et al, 2022), economic potential (Touili et al, 2018;Bagnato and Sanna, 2019), overall economic feasibility (Comidy et al, 2019)], process factors [i.e., energy saving percentage (Kong et al, 2020), process parameter optimization (Yang et al, 2018;Samani et al, 2022), efficiency of operation (Bock et al, 2021)], and environmental factor (Fahmy et al, 2021;Shawky Ismail et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%