2017
DOI: 10.1002/ep.12722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno‐economic analysis of protein concentrate produced by flash hydrolysis of microalgae

Abstract: Process simulation and techno‐economic analysis (TEA) of 95 wt % protein concentrate (water‐soluble peptides and free amino acids) from microalgae was performed using SuperPro Designer v9.0. The analysis includes processes such as microalgae cultivation, harvesting, protein extraction, and spray drying. The subcritical water‐based Flash Hydrolysis (FH) process was used in generating bench‐scale continuous flow reactor experimental data on protein extraction from microalgae slurry. The TEA is conducted for a ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be achieved by either simulation using different mathematical models or by conducting actual trials [372]. To significantly save time and cost for process development, simulation has been used to analyse technical and economic feasibility of industrial production of proteins from different SPBs (kingfish [373], catfish [374], tuna [375], and shrimp [376]) and microalgae [377,378]). Industrial production of fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) from yellow tail kingfish processing by-products (YTKPBs) by chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis with microwave intensification was simulated using a commercial simulator, SuperPro Designer [373].…”
Section: Economic Feasibility and Industrial Production Of Protein-bamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by either simulation using different mathematical models or by conducting actual trials [372]. To significantly save time and cost for process development, simulation has been used to analyse technical and economic feasibility of industrial production of proteins from different SPBs (kingfish [373], catfish [374], tuna [375], and shrimp [376]) and microalgae [377,378]). Industrial production of fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) from yellow tail kingfish processing by-products (YTKPBs) by chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis with microwave intensification was simulated using a commercial simulator, SuperPro Designer [373].…”
Section: Economic Feasibility and Industrial Production Of Protein-bamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soluble protein value chain is also least investigated in literature in terms of process design and economic evaluation. Asiedu et al (2018) provided a TEA for production of a dry protein hydrolysate powder (amino-acid and peptides) produced via flash hydrolysis from S. obliquus cultivated in open ponds. Assuming 81% of protein extraction and conversion, they ended with production cost of 2.99 € kg −1 protein and a minimum selling price of 4.31 € kg −1 protein (Asiedu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussion: Profitability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, most applications of microalgal biomass are still for food, feed, and high value applications (Vandermeulen et al, 2012;Vigani et al, 2015;Rajesh Banu et al, 2020). The economic potential of various microalgae products has been studied previously by several authors (Davis et al, 2014;Gong and You, 2015;Quinn and Davis, 2015;Dong et al, 2016;Thomassen et al, 2016;Laurens et al, 2017;Asiedu et al, 2018;DeRose et al, 2019). Ruiz et al (2016) gave an overview of the different market scenarios for a benchmark microalgal composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, commercial expansion of the use of microalgae protein is often obstructed by the fact that proteins of many microalgae species are biologically indigestible, a drawback attributed to their hard cell walls (Ursu et al 2014 ). Chemical hydrolysis methods are mainly used to recover proteins; digestion of biomass with sodium hydroxide at higher temperatures usually provides a recovery efficiency of around 81% (Asiedu et al 2018 ). The recovery efficiency varies with microalgae species and also depends on degradation resistance.…”
Section: Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%