2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic analysis of recuperated Joule-Brayton pumped thermal energy storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Typically, energy densities are significantly less than that of water – e.g., accounting for discharge losses, the storage density of VP-1 at 220°C is about 14 kWh e /m 3 , so to store 10% of the output from a 1 GW plant for a day would require roughly 175,000 m 3 (e.g., 28 tanks of 20 m diameter by 20 m high). The cost of VP-1 lies in the range 0.4 to 2.6 £/kg 39 giving a contribution to capital cost from the storage fluid alone in the range 25 to 155 £/kWh e capacity. The upper end of this range is probably not viable.…”
Section: Thermal Storage Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Typically, energy densities are significantly less than that of water – e.g., accounting for discharge losses, the storage density of VP-1 at 220°C is about 14 kWh e /m 3 , so to store 10% of the output from a 1 GW plant for a day would require roughly 175,000 m 3 (e.g., 28 tanks of 20 m diameter by 20 m high). The cost of VP-1 lies in the range 0.4 to 2.6 £/kg 39 giving a contribution to capital cost from the storage fluid alone in the range 25 to 155 £/kWh e capacity. The upper end of this range is probably not viable.…”
Section: Thermal Storage Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat exchanger models that capture real fluid behavior were developed [33]. As an example, consider heat transfer between supercritical CO2 and a mineral oil in the cold storage system of an sCO2 PTES cycle, see Figure 2 for reference.…”
Section: Heat Exchanger Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that a number of minor losses have been ignored, including mechanical (friction) losses, fan and circulating pump work, and motor/generator losses. Quantifying these accurately requires much more detailed design but, based on other studies [27], they might be expected to reduce the efficiency by a further 5-10%.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to benefit from the low marginal energy costs described above (and recognising that unit power costs are likely to be high due to the high HWR and low power density), Z P is estimated for a nominal design with 100 MWh e / 5 MW capacity (i.e., with 20 hrs discharge duration). McTigue et al [27] present a compilation of cost correlations of process equipment often employed in PTES systems, many of which are also used in this work. In particular, cost correlations for compressors and turbines are taken from Refs.…”
Section: Estimate Of Marginal Power Cost Z Pmentioning
confidence: 99%