2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.06.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno Economic Evaluation of Amine based CO2 Capture: Impact of CO2 Concentration and Steam Supply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final capture ratio and CO2 purity in each scenario are assigned to be 90% and 95% (mol), respectively. The parameters are mainly from literature, industrial data and engineering heuristics (Anantharaman et al, 2010;Favre, 2011;Husebye et al, 2012;Hussain and Hagg, 2010;Merkel et al, 2010;Stern, 1968;Zhang et al, 2012a), and also based on the sensitivity analysis in this work.…”
Section: Key Parameters and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The final capture ratio and CO2 purity in each scenario are assigned to be 90% and 95% (mol), respectively. The parameters are mainly from literature, industrial data and engineering heuristics (Anantharaman et al, 2010;Favre, 2011;Husebye et al, 2012;Hussain and Hagg, 2010;Merkel et al, 2010;Stern, 1968;Zhang et al, 2012a), and also based on the sensitivity analysis in this work.…”
Section: Key Parameters and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorber is a simple RadFrac column, whereas the stripper column has a condenser on the top and a reboiler at the bottom. Considering the low efficiency of the gas absorber, it is modeled with a Murphree efficiency of 25~30% (Husebye et al, 2012). In the MEA-based CO2 capture process, another major issue is the degradation of the solvents through the irreversible side reactions with other flue gas components as SO2, NOx and O2, leading to solvent losses and degradation wastes (Ho et al, 2011;Koornneef et al, 2008;Portal, 2011).…”
Section: Process Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mix is separated from the gases by flashing (F204), leading to a 61 wt.% ethanol concentration and 96 % recovery. The gas stream containing carbon dioxide and non‐consumed CO and H 2 is treated in a monoethanolamine (MEA)‐based process to remove the CO 2 . The remaining fractions of CO and H 2 are mixed with fresh syngas and then fed back to the fermenter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final product purity is 99.8 wt.% (the remaining 0.2 % is water) with an overall recovery of 99.9%. Similarly as for the ethanol DSP, this DSP also includes CO 2 removal (by the MEA‐based process) from the recycling of off‐gas due to its partial consumption during fermentation stage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation