Technoeconomic Evaluation of MEA versus Mixed Amines and a Catalyst System for CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Removal at Near-Commercial Scale at Duke Energy Gibson 3 Pulverized Coal Plant and Duke Energy Buck Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) Plant

Jones, Dale A.

doi:10.2172/1499969

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Due to morphological changes in CaO sorbent after repeated cycles, its carrying capacity quickly diminishes, 16 , 17 and a stream of fresh limestone is needed to replenish the spent sorbent 18 . A major advantage of CaL technology over liquid absorption and other solid adsorption technologies is that the sorbent, limestone, is a nonhazardous chemical and is available in industrial quantities at prices of less than $100/t, compared to ∼$2900/t for MEA 19 . Moreover, there is significant worldwide capacity for using spent sorbent in industrial processes such as cement and steel making.…”

Section: Capture Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of technologies for carbon capture, sequestration, and utilization: Cost, capacity, and technology readiness

Kazemifar

2021

Greenhouse Gases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The continued rise in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration has led to calls from experts, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that has estimated that global warming needs to be limited to 1.5 °C above preindustrial levels to avoid the worst effects of climate change, and that carbon neutrality would need to be achieved globally by 2050 to meet this target. Achieving carbon neutrality by mid‐century will rely on successful implementation and widespread adoption of technologies for reducing emissions from large point sources of CO2, direct CO2 capture from the air, as well as storage and utilization technologies that would convert CO2 to a form that would ensure safety and permanency of storage. In this paper, engineering solutions for CO2 capture, utilization, and storage are reviewed with a focus on technology readiness level, and cost. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

Section: Capture Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of technologies for carbon capture, sequestration, and utilization: Cost, capacity, and technology readiness

Kazemifar

2021

Greenhouse Gases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The LCOE for the all whole system is calculated as follows [31]: [41]. The operating costs for compression and onshore pipeline are assumed to be 4% of the capital cost [30].…”

Section: Plant Cost Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

A simulation study of the effect of post-combustion amine-based carbon-capturing integrated with solar thermal collectors for combined cycle gas power plant

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Post-combustion carbon capture with solvent designed to sequestrate carbon from power plant is a promising and well-known technology. However, a vital drawback is the reduction of the power plant output due to the energy required to separate captured CO2 from the solvent, known as a re-boiler duty. In this paper, two configurations were simulated and economically examined to mitigate the re-boiler duty and power loss from the 495 MW West Damietta power plant, Egypt. The first approach is to increase carbon concentrations in the feed to carbon capture plant by recycling part of exhaust gas back to the combustion chamber with different ratios (0%–35%), the second approach is implementing parabolic-trough solar collectors to handle the reboiler load instead of low-pressure steam extracted from the power plant. Both power and CO2 capturing plants were simulated using Aspen Hysys. Parabolic trough solar collector plant was simulated using system advisor model software. The results revealed that increasing carbon content led to a remarkable decrease in reboiler duty by up to around 20%. It was also found that integrating the solar plant with thermal storage system highly improved the optimum production compared to plant without thermal storage. Carbon increase also affected the levelized cost of energy which had 1.39% reduction and 6% decrease in carbon cost of avoidance using 35% recirculation ratio.

show abstract

Decarbonizing the aviation sector with Electro Sustainable Aviation Fuel (eSAF) from biogenic CO2 captured at pulp mills

Pio

Vilas-Boas

Araújo

et al. 2023

Chemical Engineering Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technoeconomic Evaluation of MEA versus Mixed Amines and a Catalyst System for CO<sub>2</sub> Removal at Near-Commercial Scale at Duke Energy Gibson 3 Pulverized Coal Plant and Duke Energy Buck Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) Plant

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

A review of technologies for carbon capture, sequestration, and utilization: Cost, capacity, and technology readiness

A review of technologies for carbon capture, sequestration, and utilization: Cost, capacity, and technology readiness

A simulation study of the effect of post-combustion amine-based carbon-capturing integrated with solar thermal collectors for combined cycle gas power plant

Decarbonizing the aviation sector with Electro Sustainable Aviation Fuel (eSAF) from biogenic CO2 captured at pulp mills

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About