Technological Innovation and Employment Reallocation

Greenan, Nathalie; Guellec, Dominique

doi:10.1111/1467-9914.00146

Cited by 146 publications

(122 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

101

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This shows that the heterogeneity regarding employment decisions that we observe for the manufacturing industry, is still apparent even after disaggregating at narrowly defined industries. The same result has been found for some other countries (see Davis and Haltiwanger (1992), Konings (1995) and Greenan and Guellec (1997) among others). Job creation ranges from 0.8 percent in iron steel and metal to 6.8 percent in plastic materials; job destruction from 4.0 percent in other non-basic industries to 7.3 percent in food, tobacco and drinks; and job reallocation varies from 5.3 percent in iron steel and metal to 13.0 percent in office machinery.…”

Section: Figure 1 : Employment Growth Histogramsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…The contributions in this line for other countries are numerous. We can mention, among others, Konings (1995) and Blanchflower and Burgess (1996) for the UK, Greenan and Guellec (1997) for France, and Dolado and Gómez (1995), Díaz-Moreno and Galdón-Sánchez (2000), and Ruano (2000) for Spain. Although all these contributions exploit longitudinal data, they differ notably in the level of data disaggregation, in the length of the sample period, and in the data coverage.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Innovation and Job Creation and Destruction

Alonso‐Borrego¹,

Collado²

2002

Recherches Économiques De Louvain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.

show abstract

Section: Figure 1 : Employment Growth Histogramsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Innovation and Job Creation and Destruction

Alonso‐Borrego¹,

Collado²

2002

Recherches Économiques De Louvain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These authors find that although process innovation displaces employment, compensation effects from product innovation seem to dominate, albeit with some differences across countries. 2 Greenan and Guellec (2000), also combining firm-level panel data with innovation surveys, find that innovating firms (and industries) have created more jobs than non-innovating ones. Piva and Vivarelli (2005), combining different surveys by Mediocredito-Capitalia from 1992-1997, build a balanced panel of 575 Italian Manufacturing firms and find a small but significant positive relation between innovative investments and employment.…”

Section: Theoretical and Empirical Underpinningsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Employment, innovation, and productivity: evidence from Italian microdata

Hall¹,

Lotti²,

Mairesse³

2008

Industrial and Corporate Change

214

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Italian manufacturing firms have been losing ground with respect to many of their European competitors. This paper presents some empirical evidence on the effects of innovation on employment growth and therefore on firms' productivity with the goal of understanding the roots of such poor performance. We use firm level data from the last three surveys on Italian manufacturing firms conducted by Mediocredito-Capitalia, which cover the period 1995-2003. Using a modified version of the model proposed by Harrison, Jaumandreu, Mairesse and Peters (2005), which separates employment growth rates into those associated with old and new products, we provide robust evidence that there is no employment displacement effect stemming from process innovation. The sources of employment growth during the period are split equally between the net contribution of product innovation and the net contribution from sales growth of old products. However, the contribution of product innovation is somewhat lower than that for the four comparison European countries considered by Harrison et al. (2005), which separates employment growth rates into those associated with old and new products, we provide robust evidence that there is no employment displacement effect stemming from process innovation. The sources of employment growth during the period are split equally between the net contribution of product innovation and the net contribution from sales growth of old products. However, the contribution of product innovation is somewhat lower than that for the four comparison European countries considered by Harrison et al. Keywords

show abstract

“…These authors found for some European countries in the late 1990s job losses in the manufacturing industry due to technological change; because of an active price competitiveness strategy, technological efforts were associated to restructuring and the market expansion effect of new products was modest. Greenan and Guellec (2000) states that for France, at the firm level, process innovation creates more jobs than product innovation while the opposite occurs at the sectoral level. However, innovative firms perform better than the others on the medium-run.…”

Section: Between 65% and 75% Of Total I And D Activities In Countries Lmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation and Its Effects on Employment Composition: Microeconomic Evidence from Colombian Firms

Mejia

Granada

2014

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyses the effects of innovation on employment in Colombian firms for the manufacturing and service sectors in two different periods: 2007-2010 for the manufacturing industry, and 2010-2011 for the service industry. Based on the theoretical framework proposed by Harrison et al. (2014), we test this relationship using instrumental variables techniques. Data proceed from The Annual Manufacturing Survey, The Development and Technological Innovation Industrial Survey, and The Development and Technological Innovation Services Survey, all of them collected by the Colombian National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE).Our empirical results show that sales growth due to new products positively affects employment growth, and process innovation has not a displacement effect on employment growth. This is robust to different specifications and the inclusion of control variables.JEL Classification: O31, O33

show abstract

Technological Innovation and Employment Reallocation

Cited by 146 publications

References 11 publications

Innovation and Job Creation and Destruction

Innovation and Job Creation and Destruction

Employment, innovation, and productivity: evidence from Italian microdata

Innovation and Its Effects on Employment Composition: Microeconomic Evidence from Colombian Firms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About