2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological learning and the future of solar H2: A component learning comparison of solar thermochemical cycles and electrolysis with solar PV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LCOH of ceria in the best case accounts to 6.68 €/kg. The results compare well with the figures recently presented by Nicodemus [25].…”
Section: Case Studysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The LCOH of ceria in the best case accounts to 6.68 €/kg. The results compare well with the figures recently presented by Nicodemus [25].…”
Section: Case Studysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The calculated price for thermochemical cycles ranged from 3.5 €/kg to 12.8 €/kg in an optimistic and conservative scenario, respectively. Recently, Nicodemus compared again solar thermochemical cycles and solar PV electrolysis [25]. The focus was on the learning curves for each of the main plant components.…”
Section: Technology and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another approach is the estimation of future cost reduction according to technological learning [4]. Nicodemus [5] investigated the impact of policy support on technological learning for PV powered PEM electrolysis resulting in the production costs of < 3 $/kg H2 by 2030. Similar results could be reached using high-temperature electrolysis [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former may result in wrong assumptions on the overall learning rate through an omitted variable bias [16]. The latter requires the utilization of composite learning curves, which for a one-factor model is given by [9,17]:…”
Section: Introduction To Learning Curve Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%