2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-014-0368-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological-level evaluation using patent statistics: model and application in mobile communications

Abstract: Information and communication technology (ICT) has been a driving force of development for knowledgebased economies. In particular, as competition in mobile communications technological innovation among nations becomes more intense, there are growing demands for improved evaluation, judgment, and prediction of mobile communications technological capability in order to improve national ICT competitiveness. Technological capability refers to conceptual-level elements that capture technological competitiveness in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a number of indexes for both scientific literatures and patents were summated into the single value based on the PCA. Although previous studies have attempted to summate a single value by analytic hierarchy process or specialists’ opinion (Cho and Park 2015 ), there was a limitation of multi-collinearity between indexes which may doubly affect overall assessment of technology levels; thus, the authors attempted to exclude multi-collinearity by using the PCA. Second, the existing quantitative assessments may not be appropriate to take account of technological obsolescence, because both recently registered and former patents were calculated as simple numeric values without consideration for technological obsolescence which made us to reflect it, caused by the lapse of time, in the technological level assessment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a number of indexes for both scientific literatures and patents were summated into the single value based on the PCA. Although previous studies have attempted to summate a single value by analytic hierarchy process or specialists’ opinion (Cho and Park 2015 ), there was a limitation of multi-collinearity between indexes which may doubly affect overall assessment of technology levels; thus, the authors attempted to exclude multi-collinearity by using the PCA. Second, the existing quantitative assessments may not be appropriate to take account of technological obsolescence, because both recently registered and former patents were calculated as simple numeric values without consideration for technological obsolescence which made us to reflect it, caused by the lapse of time, in the technological level assessment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patent applications for prebiotics and postbiotics have far-reaching implications for future research [35]. Firstly, the number and quality of patent applications can reflect the quantity and frontier research in this field, which provided an important reference information for researchers [36]. Secondly,…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patent applications for prebiotics and postbiotics have far-reaching implications for future research [35]. Firstly, the number and quality of patent applications can reflect the quantity and frontier research in this field, which provided an important reference information for researchers [36]. Secondly, patent applications can protect intellectual property of researchers and technological innovations and these patents enable them to gain economic benefits from their patents.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) результативный (Cho I., Park M. [36]; ООН [37]; Березиков С.А. [3]; Якубовский Ю.В., Карастелев Б.Я., Бровко П.М.…”
Section: результатыunclassified