Technology and material efficiency scenarios for net zero emissions in the UK steel sector

Abstract

With the UK's legislation of a 2050 net zero emissions target, there is urgent need for radical industrial decarbonisation. The steel sector represented 12% of UK industrial emissions in 2016 and is therefore a critical target for mitigation. Mainstream scenario analyses variously assume use of unproven Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) or reductions to steel demand in order to reach a 1.5 • C compatible budget by 2050. This analysis aims to: a) assess the mitigation potential of current technology options (excluding CCS) towards a cumulative budget aligned to net zero and assuming constant steel demand; b) to evaluate the potential of material efficiency to close any mitigation gaps, (where material efficiency is providing the same useful 'service' with less input of energy-intensive materials); and c) to discuss the importance of sectoral budget assumptions and other uncertainties in estimating the scale of future mitigation required by the industry and the policy implications of this. We modelled four key technology scenarios including steel plant retrofit, replacement of steelmaking technologies to best practice standards, fuel shifts to greater Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) production, and implementation of selected novel technologies, under different ambition levels. Technology scenarios could reduce cumulative Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions (2016-2050) by as much as 44% against a constant baseline, whilst coupled technology and material efficiency scenarios could achieve reductions of as much as 53%. We also find that whilst grid electricity decarbonisation and earlier demand reduction can achieve additional mitigation, there may still be a need for some CCS capacity in the long-term to address residual emissions. In the most ambitious case, absolute GHG emissions from the steel sector reduced by 80% by 2050 against 2016 levels, assuming grid decarbonisation. We found that the most effective interventions were through established technologies, such as retrofit, replacement and EAF production, since they were immediately available, with the condition they are implemented faster than previously observed. Given the commercialisation constraints of novel technologies, structural shifts such as material efficiency and EAF production were considered highly important. However, structural changes are necessarily more complex to influence via policy, and there is little precedent for structural change by design in the UK. Our results show that only complementary scenarios combining material efficiency and technology options would achieve a level of mitigation near to net zero in the UK. We conclude that it is possible to achieve net zero emissions in the UK steel sector, but that this would require greater and earlier levels of material efficiency and some degree of CCS removal capacity.

Analysis of Environmental Priorities for Green Project Investments Using an Integrated q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Modeling

“…They stated that carbon capture technologies should be improved. Garavey et al [41] focused on the scenarios for net-zero emissions in the UK steel sector. They claimed that necessary investments should be made for carbon capture and storage technologies.…”

Delivering net zero in the UK: twelve conditions for success

“…Rapidly reducing cumulative emissions is imperative, meaning the actions taken in the next decade will define whether long term climate goals can be met. Achieving this requires an urgent and unprecedented transformation of current energy systems, land use, industrial systems, infrastructure and the social and cultural practices which interact with these systems [3][4][5][6][7]. However, analysis from the UK's independent statutory body on climate change shows that the UK is currently off track to achieve these changes in a range of areas, making it increasingly challenging to meet its climate commitments [8].…”

Policy and pricing barriers to steel industry decarbonisation: A UK case study

“…Previous research into the decarbonisation of steel production has typically focused on specific technology options (Vogl et al, 2018;Leeson et al, 2017;Mandova et al, 2019) or the development of country-specific roadmaps (Dixon et al, 2022;Garvey et al, 2022;Griffin and Hammond, 2021), for example based on improvement potentials and marginal abatement cost curves. To date, little attention has been given to the barriers that prevent steel producers from deploying green steelmaking technologies whilst remaining competitive with emissions-intensive incumbents, or to the policy changes that would be necessary to remove these barriers.…”