Technology-assisted intervention for parents of adolescents in residential substance use treatment: protocol of an open trial and pilot randomized trial

Abstract

BackgroundAdolescents in residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have poor outcomes post-discharge, with follow-up studies suggesting that most adolescents relapse within 90 days. Parenting practices directly influence adolescent SUD outcomes, but parents of adolescents with SUDs are difficult to engage in traditional behavioral treatments. The current study adapts and evaluates a technology-assisted intervention for parents of adolescents in residential SUD treatment. Based on pilot qualitative data with parents, adolescents, and residential staff, we augment an existing computerized intervention (Parenting Wisely; PW) with four in-person coaching sessions, personalized text messages, and an expert-moderated online parent message board. We hypothesize that parents will find enhanced PW (PW+) both feasible and acceptable, and that adolescents whose parents receive PW+ will have better post-discharge outcomes than adolescents who receive standard care (SC) only.Methods/designA two phase approach is used to adapt and evaluate PW+. Phase 1 consists of an open trial with 10 parents of adolescents (age 12–17) in residential SUD treatment. Post-discharge qualitative and quantitative data from parents and adolescents will support PW+ refinement. Phase 2 is a randomized pilot trial with 60 parents testing the effectiveness of adding PW+ to SC. Adolescents and parents will complete assessments at baseline, 6-, 12-, and 24-weeks post-discharge. Primary outcomes will be measures of feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes will include adolescent substance use, truancy, high-risk sexual behavior, and criminal involvement. Two parenting processes (monitoring and communication) are examined as potential mediators of change.DiscussionThis study will adapt and evaluate a technology-assisted parenting intervention as a means of improving adolescent outcomes following residential SUD treatment. Results have the potential to advance the field by: addressing a high-risk population, improving parental engagement; targeting parenting practices (putative mediators of change) that have been linked to adolescent outcomes; and developing a highly disseminable approach.

Randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of primary care-based facilitated access to an alcohol reduction website

“… 10 However a recent paper has suggested that higher cut points should be used to reliably identify risky drinkers. 26 In addition, the statistical analyses assumed a similar clustering effect for both treatment conditions at the practice level, through fitting practice level random effects. It could be argued that differences in the intervention could lead to difference in the clustering within practices; however, our assumption a priori, based on substantial relevant experience, was that shared practice characteristics were likely to be the dominant factors in our analysis.…”

Long term impact of PositiveLinks: Clinic-deployed mobile technology to improve engagement with HIV care

“…mHealth may be an especially important tool to address disparities in chronic disease outcomes due to high acceptability and accessibility of mobilebased technologies for underserved populations [2,3], including those who are disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic and are less likely to achieve key clinical outcomes like sustained viral suppression [4]. Through features such as appointment reminders and accessible communication channels with providers, mHealth has been shown to help engage patients lost to or at risk of being lost to care by providing information more efficiently and effectively [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Further, features such as medication reminders and self-monitoring of behaviors have been associated with improvements in engagement in care and clinical outcomes [8,12,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”

Preventing Opioid Overdose in the Clinic and Hospital

“…Although the auto-injector and nasal spray are easy to use and avoid the risk of needle stick injuries, the auto-injector is costly and both have variable insurance coverage. 55 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration has issued an Opioid Overdose Prevention Toolkit 56 and Prescribe to Prevent (prescribetoprevent.org) provides Continuing Medical Education for medical providers.…”