Technology R&amp;D alliances and firm value

Neill, John D.; Pfeiffer, Glenn; Young-Ybarra, Candace E

doi:10.1016/s1047-8310(01)00038-4

Cited by 49 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In general, technology alliances are hypothesized to add value to the partnering firms. In particular, an event studies recently found significant positive abnormal returns surrounding the announcement of IT alliances (Neill et al, 2001). These studies lead us to conclude that public announcements regarding IT/IS outsourcing decisions are likely to have a positive effect on short-term returns as well, supporting the behavioral notion that investors put more weight on recent events regardless of fundamentals (representativeness bias).…”

Section: The Behavioral Finance Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 53%

“…We employ event studies methodology to assess the change in firm value around the time of the outsourcing agreement (Brown & Warner, 1985;McWilliams & Siegel, 1997;Neill et al, 2001;Park et al, 2004;Shi, 1998). The variables are examined using cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) which are the sum of daily returns, for a specified time window, in excess of general stock market movements.…”

Section: Computation Of Abnormal Returnsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Information technology outsourcing and organizational restructuring: An explanation of their effects on firm value

Florín

Bradford

Pagach

2005

The Journal of High Technology Management Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Behavioral Finance Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 53%

Section: Computation Of Abnormal Returnsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Information technology outsourcing and organizational restructuring: An explanation of their effects on firm value

Florín

Bradford

Pagach

2005

The Journal of High Technology Management Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…They are relatively common in R&D collaboration (Neil et al, 2001) and present significant management challenges (Minshall et al, 2010). However, research on the distribution of benefits between asymmetric alliance partners, measured in terms of shareholder value, has not reached a consensus.…”

Section: Asymmetric Business Alliancesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Distribution of Partnerships Benefits: Evidence from Co-Authorships in Economics Journals

Bidault

Hildebrand²

2012

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Academic partnerships are also very common and offer a fertile ground for investigation. Academic cooperation takes many different forms and results in a wide range of outcomes (Laband and Tollison, 2000). One of the most visible outcomes is co-authored publications (Melin and Persson, 1996). Nowadays, there is extensive data available about both the context of these partnerships as well as the quality of their outcome. This paper explores the determinants of the gain for authors who cooperate through co-authorship in the publication of academic articles. We distinguish between short-term benefits (i.e. the increase in citations of the co-authored article relative to the authors' previous publications) and the long-term ones (i.e. the increase in citations of articles subsequent to the coauthored piece). We find evidence that these benefits have different determinants for co-authors depending on their past experience. While co-authorship generally seems to benefit more the junior (younger and with a lower academic reputation) author, the senior partner can reduce the gap with a strong personal track record and co-authoring experience. Terms of use: Documents in

show abstract

“…Similarly, some management scholars have also published work that attempts to take a holistic view of technological innovation, linking together community, population, and organization considerations (e.g., Drazin & Schoonhoven, 1996;Henderson & Mitchell, 1997;Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997;Wade, 1995Wade, , 1996. Recent research places emphasis on empirical investigations of the impact of interorganizational cooperation on the performance of technology enterprises (Neill, Pfeiffer, & Young-Ybarra, 2001;Park, Chen, & Gallagher, 2002;Steensma & Corley, 2000) and on the role of organizations other than firms, such as universities, in such relationships (Santoro, 2000;Spencer, 2001).…”

Section: Complex Interorganizational Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Affordable Resources strategy and the Milieux Embeddedness strategy as alternative approaches to facilitating innovation in a knowledge-intensive industry

Willoughby

2004

The Journal of High Technology Management Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technology R&D alliances and firm value

Cited by 49 publications

References 11 publications

Information technology outsourcing and organizational restructuring: An explanation of their effects on firm value

Information technology outsourcing and organizational restructuring: An explanation of their effects on firm value

The Distribution of Partnerships Benefits: Evidence from Co-Authorships in Economics Journals

The Affordable Resources strategy and the Milieux Embeddedness strategy as alternative approaches to facilitating innovation in a knowledge-intensive industry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About