2013
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2013.2289745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology Scaling Comparison of Flip-Flop Heavy-Ion Single-Event Upset Cross Sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technology scaling has increased the vulnerability of flipflops to single-event upset (SEU) [1,2,3]. Reduced nodal capacitance and supply voltage decrease the critical charge required to upset [4,5,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology scaling has increased the vulnerability of flipflops to single-event upset (SEU) [1,2,3]. Reduced nodal capacitance and supply voltage decrease the critical charge required to upset [4,5,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single event transients (SETs) has become a major reliability concern for nanoscale technologies [1,2,3]. Reduced nodal capacitances and supply voltages decrease the minimal charge to cause a transient pulse [4,5,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SET distributions for the target circuit C-E.IEICE Electronics Express, Vol.16, No.8,[1][2][3][4] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As technology progresses, some redundancy designs become sensitive, the single event upset (SEU) mitigation of DICE flip-flop decreases greatly compared with D flip-flop [9]. The difference between D and DICE flip-flop error rates decreases to about 30%-50% in 40 nm technology [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%