2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic evolution of the India–Asia suture zone since Middle Eocene time, Lopukangri area, south-central Tibet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
3
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Farther south, Cretaceous-Paleocene Xigaze forearc basin strata (Wang et al, 2006) are bounded to both the north and south by steeply dipping, top-north reverse faults that can be traced continuously along strike as strands of the Miocene Great Counter thrust system (Heim and Gansser, 1939;Yin et al, 1999;Sanchez et al, 2013). South of the forearc basin strata is a unit of sedimentary-matrix mélange that includes blocks of Neo-Tethys oceanic crust and Tethyan Himalayan strata, which likely formed as the Tethyan margin entered the trench and is interpreted to be equivalent to the "wildflysch" of Burg and Chen (1984).…”
Section: Geology Of the Yarlung Suture Zone In The Lopu Range Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Farther south, Cretaceous-Paleocene Xigaze forearc basin strata (Wang et al, 2006) are bounded to both the north and south by steeply dipping, top-north reverse faults that can be traced continuously along strike as strands of the Miocene Great Counter thrust system (Heim and Gansser, 1939;Yin et al, 1999;Sanchez et al, 2013). South of the forearc basin strata is a unit of sedimentary-matrix mélange that includes blocks of Neo-Tethys oceanic crust and Tethyan Himalayan strata, which likely formed as the Tethyan margin entered the trench and is interpreted to be equivalent to the "wildflysch" of Burg and Chen (1984).…”
Section: Geology Of the Yarlung Suture Zone In The Lopu Range Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tectonic slivers of ophiolitic mélange are locally exposed between sedimentary-matrix mélange and forearc rocks ( Fig. 1, 2 (Wang et al, 2006) and their U-Pb detrital zircon age signatures (Sanchez et al, 2013).…”
Section: Geology Of the Yarlung Suture Zone In The Lopu Range Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the Zagros mountains and Turkey (Pontides), widespread arc magmatism occurred during the Mesozoic and the Cenozoic (Sengör et al, 1988;Okay andŞahintürk, 1997;Barrier and Vrielynck, 2008;Agard et al, 2011;Eyuboglu et al, 2011). In southern Tibet, a long-lasting volcanic 'Gangdese' arc was active from Early Cretaceous to Eocene time (Ji et al, 2009), with a short-lived ignimbrite flare-up stage around 50 Ma coinciding with Tibetan Himalaya-Lhasa continental collision (Ji et al, 2009), followed by return of the arc to a background state until the Late Eocene (Sanchez et al, 2013). In Sundaland, Paleocene-Eocene magmatism was likely active since at least ∼ 63 Ma (e.g., McCourt et al, 1996;Bellon et al, 2004).…”
Section: Neo-tethyan History and Related Arc Volcanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermochronology data from Gangdese batholith rocks exposed along the Yarlung suture zone (Copeland et al, 1987(Copeland et al, , 1995Harrison et al, 1992;Dai et al, 2013;Sanchez et al, 2013;Carrapa et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2015;Ge et al, 2016;Li et al, 2016;Laskowski et al, 2017) reveal an orogen-scale Oligocene-Miocene exhumation event, possibly associated with one or more tectonic, climatic, and erosional factors (Carrapa et al, 2014(Carrapa et al, , 2017. Low-temperature thermochronology data from the Kailas Formation reveal a preponderance of Miocene (19-15 Ma) cooling ages, which have been interpreted to record efficient erosion associated with drainage reorganization and establishment of the Yarlung River during early Miocene time (Carrapa et al, 2014;Lang and Huntington, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-2) and the low-lying Yarlung suture zone ( Fig. 1), including flexure in a foreland basin setting (Wang et al, 2015), crustal thickening driven by the Great Counter thrust (Sanchez et al, 2013) or Gangdese thrust (e.g., Yin et al, 1994), and fluvial incision influenced by the strengthening Asian monsoon coupled with renewed Indian underthrusting (Carrapa et al, 2014). No structural model exists that reconciles the roles of the Gangdese thrust and Great Counter thrust system, provides context for Oligocene-Miocene sedimentary basin development along the suture zone, explains relief generation of the Gangdese Mountains, and provides a mechanism for Yarlung River establishment while maintaining compatibility with thermochronometric data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%