Dinosaur Systematics 1990
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511608377.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teeth and taxonomy in ankylosaurs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, naming isolated herbivore-like teeth can be hazardous because future work may show that separate species possess identical dental morphologies (e.g. Lambe 1918;Coombs 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, naming isolated herbivore-like teeth can be hazardous because future work may show that separate species possess identical dental morphologies (e.g. Lambe 1918;Coombs 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the identification of some of the previously examined teeth, such as those of Velociraptor and Tarbosaurus by Dauphin (1988Dauphin ( , 1989, is dubious; these teeth were described as isolated finds, so they cannot be confidently attributed to taxa at the generic level (Dauphin et al, 1989). To make matters even worse, some of the taxa, such as "Paronychodon" (Cope, 1876) and "Palaeoscincus" (Leidy, 1856), are nomina dubia erected on the basis of isolated teeth (Coombs, 1990;Currie et al, 1990). Sampling on a finer scale is not useful if the specimens studied cannot also be identified to a finer level, i.e., to the genus or species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b in CHE02.084). The mesiodistal asymmetry of the crown mentioned by Galton (1990) or Galton and Upchurch (2004), with a convex mesial outline bearing fewer and/or larger marginal denticles (contrary to what is observed in ankylosaurs by Coombs 1990), and a slightly concave distal outline with smaller denticles, is unclear here. Even though some denticles are broken or worn, the mesial and distal outlines seem quite symmetrical, convex, with similar marginal denticles in terms of number and size.…”
Section: Affinities Amongst Stegosauriamentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Stegosaurus and Hesperosaurus; difference between LHNB(CN)-1-01 and other known Stegosaurus). In the same way, Coombs (1990) has observed a high variability of this character in ankylosaurs, even in a single individual. Thus b Magnified lateral view of the left jaw, with very well-preserved teeth, including several maxillary teeth still in original position, and possibly some displaced dentary teeth in the posterior part.…”
Section: Affinities Amongst Stegosauriamentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation