2014
DOI: 10.1364/ol.39.002526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telecom-band degenerate-frequency photon pair generation in silicon microring cavities

Abstract: In this Letter, telecom-band degenerate-frequency photon pairs are generated in a specific mode of a silicon microring cavity by the nondegenerate spontaneous four-wave mixing (SFWM) process, under two continuous-wave pumps at resonance wavelength of two different cavity modes. The ratio of coincidence to accidental coincidence is up to 100 under a time bin width of 5 ns, showing their characteristics of quantum correlation. Their quantum interference in balanced and unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometers is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, when there is only one pump, the generated photons are at two different frequencies ωs and ω i , satisfying energy conversion ωs + ω i = 2ωp and phase matching ks + k i + 2 P − 2kp = 0; while when there are two pump waves at different frequencies ω p1 and ω p2 , the generated photons are frequency degenerate at ω s,i , also meeting the requirement of energy conversion 2ω s,i = ω p1 + ω p2 and phase matching 2k s,i + (P 1 + P 2 ) − k p1 − k p2 = 0 [25]. The former process can be used for heralded single-photon generation [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], and the latter can be used for indistinguishable photon-pair generation [38][39][40]. Phase matching is achieved by engineering the dispersion profile of the device through designing the device geometry and tailoring the waveguide core-cladding index contrast by the use of different cladding materials.…”
Section: Silicon Devices For Single Photon Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3, when there is only one pump, the generated photons are at two different frequencies ωs and ω i , satisfying energy conversion ωs + ω i = 2ωp and phase matching ks + k i + 2 P − 2kp = 0; while when there are two pump waves at different frequencies ω p1 and ω p2 , the generated photons are frequency degenerate at ω s,i , also meeting the requirement of energy conversion 2ω s,i = ω p1 + ω p2 and phase matching 2k s,i + (P 1 + P 2 ) − k p1 − k p2 = 0 [25]. The former process can be used for heralded single-photon generation [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], and the latter can be used for indistinguishable photon-pair generation [38][39][40]. Phase matching is achieved by engineering the dispersion profile of the device through designing the device geometry and tailoring the waveguide core-cladding index contrast by the use of different cladding materials.…”
Section: Silicon Devices For Single Photon Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, several groups including us have reported the on-chip demonstrations based on silicon nanowires [17], PhC slow-light waveguides [39], and microrings [38,40]. In Refs.…”
Section: Frequency-degenerate Photon Pair Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…27,31 These superior features together with mature nanofabrication technology make silicon an ideal platform for integrated quantum photonic application. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Here we propose and demonstrate an ultra-bright high-purity chip-scale photon source on the silicon-oninsulator (SOI) platform. By taking advantage of the dramatic cavity enhanced four-wave mixing in a high-quality silicon microdisk resonator, we are able to achieve a spectral brightness of 6.25 × 10 8 pair/s/mW 2 /GHz, orders of magnitude larger than other photon-pair sources, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and a strong quantum correlation of g (2) si (0) = (2.58 ± 0.16) × 10 4 which violates the classical Schwarz inequality by four orders of magnitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%