2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telehealth in US hospitals: State-level reimbursement policies no longer influence adoption rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some supportive care services, such as occupational therapists and speech language pathologists, initially found the transition to virtual care challenging, although the majority were able to adapt and continue to provide high-quality and well tolerated care [ 33 , 34 ]. Government and regulatory agencies made significant adjustments to allow broader acceptance and financial reimbursement of telehealth [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Widespread Adoption Of Telemedicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some supportive care services, such as occupational therapists and speech language pathologists, initially found the transition to virtual care challenging, although the majority were able to adapt and continue to provide high-quality and well tolerated care [ 33 , 34 ]. Government and regulatory agencies made significant adjustments to allow broader acceptance and financial reimbursement of telehealth [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Widespread Adoption Of Telemedicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies show a steady increase in the use of telemedicine among patients and caregivers, along with a high level of satisfaction (Levoy et al, 2022; Schoenmaekers et al, 2020; Velasco Yanez et al, 2023). Telemedicine is widespread in many countries, and although it has many advantages including: a virtual platform that allows multiple family members/caregivers to participate in the patient's palliative care, helps patients overcome disability and mobility difficulties to receive care, government and regulatory agencies adopt policies that increase reimbursement rates (Gaziel‐Yablowitz et al, 2021; Onesti et al, 2021), treats a wider range of patients (Biswas, Adhikari, & Bhatnagar, 2020; De Guzman & Malik, 2020), and provides a more convenient and comfortable patient experience (Calton et al, 2020; Donelan et al, 2019; Powell et al, 2017; Tasneem et al, 2019), telemedicine still has However, telemedicine still has shortcomings that cannot be ignored. This review shows that not all patients can experience telemedicine due to cultural and language barriers and financial constraints, which can increase inequality in healthcare resources (Chunara et al, 2021; Mercadante et al, 2020; Worster & Swartz, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with relaxed regulations around telemedicine and opioid prescriptions, there were considerable changes in the reimbursement for telemedicine [35]. Telemedicine visits were historically reimbursed lower than in-person visits, making it a barrier for clinicians to offer virtual care to patients.…”
Section: Reimbursementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telemedicine visits were historically reimbursed lower than in-person visits, making it a barrier for clinicians to offer virtual care to patients. Similar to the regulations around opioid prescribing, the reimbursement for virtual visits must remain favorable for patients and clinicians after the pandemic [35,36]. In countries such as the U.S., the future of telemedicine is highly dependent on policy decisions regarding reimbursement after the COVID-19 pandemic [37].…”
Section: Reimbursementmentioning
confidence: 99%