Temperature and Plant Nutrient Effects on Resistance of Seedling Sorghum to the Greenhug12

Schweissing, Frank; Wilde, Gerald E.

doi:10.1093/jee/72.1.20

Cited by 32 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, high temperatures (23 and 26°C) diminish the expression of genes in wheat that control resistance against biotypes of the Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor Say (Sosa and Foster 1976;Sosa 1979;Tyler and Hatchett 1983;Ratanatham and Gallun 1986). Low temperatures (15-21°C) cause the loss of antibiosis, antixenosis and tolerance of sorghum to three biotypes of the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) (Schweissing and Wilde 1979;Harvey et al 1994;Thindwa and Teetes 1994), but tolerance of barley, oat and rye to one biotype is greater at lower temperatures (Schweissing and Wilde 1978). Host plant resistance may break down at high or low temperatures because the plant produces a lower concentration of deterrent chemicals (Breen 1992) or produces exudates that less effectively protect the plant (Walters et al 1991).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Temperature influences the expression of resistance of soybean (Glycine max) to the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines)

Richardson

2011

J Applied Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resistance of plants to arthropods may be lost at low or high temperatures. I tested whether the relative resistance of five genotypes of soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., to three isolates of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, was influenced by three temperatures, 14, 21 and 28°C, in no‐choice tests in the laboratory. The interaction between temperature and the genotype of soybean influenced the population sizes of two isolates of A. glycines. Two genotypes of soybean, LD05‐16611 and PI 567597C, which usually are resistant to isolate 1 and 3, became susceptible: LD05‐16611 at the low temperature and PI 567597C at the high temperature. The genotypes PI 200538 and PI 567541B usually are susceptible to isolate 3 but were resistant at 21 and 28°C. I can only speculate as to the reason why temperature influences resistance of some genotypes of soybean to A. glycines: A. glycines may be directly influenced by temperature or indirectly influenced by changes in the host plant. Nevertheless, my results suggest that temperature may be one factor that influences the expression of resistance of soybean to A. glycines, so genotypes of soybean should be screened for resistance to the aphid at multiple temperatures.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Temperature influences the expression of resistance of soybean (Glycine max) to the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines)

Richardson

2011

J Applied Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tolerance reflects changes in the relative growth rate of plant tissues, which are probably also energetically costly. On the other hand, some studies suggest that antibiosis and tolerance may both contribute to resistance of cereals against aphids (Schweissing & Wilde, 1979;Robinson et al, 1991;Le RU et al, 1994), although again the relative importance of tolerance and antibiosis could not be quantified. In these experiments, however, the role of antibiosis and tolerance could not be separated experimentally because of difficulties in distinguishing tolerance from antibiosis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Tolerance and antibiosis are not associated for Sirobion auenae on winter wheats (Havliekova, 1993) and for Acyrrhosiphon kondoi Shinjii on lucerne (Wellings, 1985). Interestingly, temperature stresses (Schweissing & Wilde, 1978, 1979 and nutrient limitation (Schweissing & Wilde, 1979;Le RU et al, 1994) reduce the level of antibiosis and tolerance, implying that resource availability may limit the simultaneous expression of the two categories of resistance. On the other hand, some studies suggest that antibiosis and tolerance may both contribute to resistance of cereals against aphids (Schweissing & Wilde, 1979;Robinson et al, 1991;Le RU et al, 1994), although again the relative importance of tolerance and antibiosis could not be quantified.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tolerance of antibiotic and susceptible cereal seedlings to the aphids Metopolophium dirhodum and Rhopalosiphum padi

Lamb

MacKay

1995

Annals of Applied Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Some cereal seedlings exhibit antibiotic and antixenotic resistance to the aphids Metopolophium dirhodum (Walker) and Rhopalosiphum padi (L.), because the seedlings contain hydroxamic acids or gramine. The association between tolerance to aphids and aphid antibiosis was investigated for three cereals, Dollarbird wheat Vulcan wheat and Yagan barley. The dry biomass gained by the aphids and the simultaneous reduction in the biomass of the plants (biomass conversion ratio) quantified tolerance. Biomass production and the density dependence of biomass production by the aphids quantified antibiosis more effectively than fecundity. Vulcan wheat, which has more hydroxamic acid than Dollarbird wheat showed the highest level of antibiosis, and the barley was not antibiotic for either aphid. The biomass conversion ratio was a constant; the biomass of an infested plant was reduced by 3 mg for each mg of aphid biomass gained, regardless of aphid species, plant cultivar, or aphid density. The three plants showed no differential tolerance to the aphids, and therefore tolerance is not associated with antibiosis in this case.

show abstract

“…The fact that spider mite populations on Buddleia are less concentrated on the new growth of a faster-growing plant than on a similar slower-growing plant is consistent with tolerance, which is the ability of a plant to outgrow an arthropod infestation (Smith, 1989). Tolerance is affected by environmental factors, including temperature (Schweissing and Wilde, 1978) and nutritional status (Schweissing and Wilde, 1979), which can affect the growth and development of both pest and host (Smith, 1989).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Drought Stress Increases Densities but Not Populations of Two-spotted Spider Mite on Buddleia davidii `Pink Delight'

Gillman¹,

Rieger²,

Dirr³

et al. 1999

HortSci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of drought stress on the susceptibility of Buddleia davidii Franch. `Pink Delight' to the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch). In the first experiment, drought stress was imposed by withholding water until predawn xylem pressure potential fell below -1 MPa. Shoot growth was 75% less in drought-stressed than in nonstressed plants. Mite population densities were not affected, but noninfested leaf area was 14% higher, and degree of mite damage was lower, in nonstressed plants. Evidently, the greater amount of new growth in nonstressed plants leads to lower spider mite densities by diluting populations. In a second experiment, nonstressed B. davidii `Pink Delight' plants were watered every 1 to 2 days and drought-stressed plants were watered every 3 days. Spider mite populations were monitored by sampling newly expanded and mature foliage. Mite populations on mature foliage were not affected by stress, but stressed plants grew less and had larger spider mite populations on their newly expanded foliage than did nonstressed plants.

show abstract

Temperature and Plant Nutrient Effects on Resistance of Seedling Sorghum to the Greenhug12

Cited by 32 publications

References 0 publications

Temperature influences the expression of resistance of soybean (Glycine max) to the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines)

Temperature influences the expression of resistance of soybean (Glycine max) to the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines)

Tolerance of antibiotic and susceptible cereal seedlings to the aphids Metopolophium dirhodum and Rhopalosiphum padi

Drought Stress Increases Densities but Not Populations of Two-spotted Spider Mite on Buddleia davidii `Pink Delight'

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About