“…First, electron transfer to P+ is faster from heme c-552 than from heme c-559, as mentioned above: this difference does not agree with the proposed arrangement unless c-559 acts as an intermediate in the oxidation of c-552, a property that has not yet been evidenced. Second, according to the classical data of several laboratories obtained on a number of bacterial species, one low-potential heme remains fully photooxidizable at low temperatures (Vredenberg & Duysens, 1964;De Vault & Chance, 1966;De Vault et al, 1967; ; ; Dutton et al, 1970Dutton et al, , 1971; Dutton, 1971;Tiede et al, 1976; Nitschke & Rutherford, 1989) whereas á major part of the high-potential hemes is no longer capable of efficient electron donation to P+ (Vredenberg & Duysens, 1964;Dutton et al, 1970Dutton et al, , 1971Dutton, 1971;Rubin et al, 1989; Nitschke & Rutherford, 1989). This fact has long served as an argument for the concept of independent and parallel pathways for lowand high-potential heme oxidation by P+, a concept which could also account for room temperature results showing that a faster electron donation from low-potential hemes than from high-potential hemes takes place in many bacterial species Seibert & De Vault, 1970;Kononenko et al, 1974;Tiede et al, 1976; Dutton & Prince, 1978; Bixon & Jortner, 1986a,b, 1989.…”