2005
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2005-00174-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of ferromagnetic resonance in permalloy/NiO exchange-biased films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters were set as follows: 0 = 1.5ϫ 10 −9 s and ␦ = 31 K. The impurities responsible for the slow-relaxer process are, therefore, well described in our study by paramagnetic atoms at the interface. One should note that it is in agreement with the results of Dubowik et al 9 obtained in a more restricted temperature region. As evoked by Safonov and Bertram, 16 their appearance could be explained by imperfections in fine grains consisting in either paramagnetic ions such as Mn 3+ , or surface magnetic atoms that behave like impurities.…”
Section: But Only When H E ӷ H Wsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The parameters were set as follows: 0 = 1.5ϫ 10 −9 s and ␦ = 31 K. The impurities responsible for the slow-relaxer process are, therefore, well described in our study by paramagnetic atoms at the interface. One should note that it is in agreement with the results of Dubowik et al 9 obtained in a more restricted temperature region. As evoked by Safonov and Bertram, 16 their appearance could be explained by imperfections in fine grains consisting in either paramagnetic ions such as Mn 3+ , or surface magnetic atoms that behave like impurities.…”
Section: But Only When H E ӷ H Wsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The slow-relaxer model has already been applied to NiFe/NiO and NiFe/CoO exchange-biased bilayers. [7][8][9] The observation of a peak in the thermal dependence of the linewidth by McMichael et al 7 and Lubitz et al 8 drove them to analyze the slow relaxation mechanism as the consequence of the thermal reversal of the antiferromagnetic grains and to consider the antiferromagnetic grains as the impurities coupled to the ferromagnet by exchange. This scenario was rejected by Dubowik et al 9 who considered paramagnetic Ni 2+ and Fe 2+ ions at the NiFe/ NiO interface as impurities responsible for the slow-relaxer process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the suggested models, this seems to give the best fit, supporting the theory of slow relaxation by paramagnetic ions as suggested by others. [13][14][15] This model is consistent with that used in Refs. 14 and 15.…”
Section: Aip Advances 8 056302 (2018)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Others have suggested that the impurities are paramagnetic ions present at the interface of the ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic layers. [13][14][15] In this work, the theory of paramagnetic ion relaxation is used to describe experimental observations. according to the number of layers to hold the total sample thickness constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was also applied to NiFe/NiO and NiFe/CoO exchange-biased bilayers. [15][16][17] McMichael et al 15 as well as Lubitz et al 16 explained the peak observed in the thermal dependence of the linewidth, ⌬H, by the slow relaxer ͑SR͒ model: they, indeed, considered the antiferromagnetic grains as the impurities coupled to the ferromagnet by exchange. On the other hand, this scenario was rejected by Dubowik et al, 17 who proposed that paramagnetic Ni 2+ and Fe 2+ ions at the NiFe/ NiO interface act as impurities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%