2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature distribution and melt geometry in laser and electron-beam melting processes – A comparison among common materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 melting (EBM) [31] and laser metal powder deposition (LMPD) [32]. The melt pool size, also, gets smaller as the scanning speed increases.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 melting (EBM) [31] and laser metal powder deposition (LMPD) [32]. The melt pool size, also, gets smaller as the scanning speed increases.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking a closer view, pre-alloyed Ti-6Al-4V powders, with a liquidus temperature of 1650ºC and solidus temperature of 1605ºC, display a "mushy" zone within the melt pool, and the cooling rate of this melt pool informs the layer-wise microstructural progression [57] . Cooling rates within the melt pool can range between 12000 and 40000 ºC/s depending on the amount of energy supplied (dictated by process parameters such as laser power and scan speed) [44,58] .…”
Section: Slm Part Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBM is a powder bed fusion technique quite similar to SLM, with the major difference being the energy source, which is an electron beam as opposed to a laser beam [57,83] . This requires a high vacuum in the build chamber to maintain beam integrity.…”
Section: Ebmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 6, a summarization of the process, parameters and KPIs of the different modelling approaches can be seen. In EBM, there is a limited number of the existing modelling publications, which focus almost entirely on thermal modelling [72], in which the analytical approach has been followed and [32,41,49,50,[73][74][75][76][77] via numerical methods. However, in [32] the residual stresses and distortions are also modelled using numerical methods.…”
Section: Electron Beam Meltingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference number KPI Process parameter (Variable) [32] Residual stresses, distortions [41] System temperature [49] Heat transfer related [50] Part Temperature history Layer position in the part under construction [72] Penetration depth, energy loss Target material, accelerating voltage [73] Absorption coefficient Penetration depth, dissipated energy [74] Thermal modelling, melt pool dimensions Beam power, beam scan speed [75] Thermal modelling, melt pool dimensions Beam speed, beam current, beam diameter [76] Thermal modelling Acceleration, voltage, current, shape, beam gun movements, exponential, constant absorption types [77] Thermal modelling, lifetime dimensions of the melt pool Scan speed, line energy Table 7. Classification of the of the modelling studies on the DED AM process.…”
Section: Kpimentioning
confidence: 99%