2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature effect on kinetic friction characteristics of Cu substrate composed by single crystal and polycrystalline structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 c,d show the total force and the number of graphite atoms of different substrate temperatures at 100 m/s, 10 Å depth. The total force values are 2254 nN, 2188 nN, 1868 nN, and 1859 nN, correlating to 300 K, 600 K, 900 K, and 1200 K. The force slightly reduces when raising the substrate temperature because the substrate becomes softer at a higher temperature 21 23 . At a higher temperature, the atoms vibrate at a faster rate, the bonding strength between them is weakened, leading to a softer material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 c,d show the total force and the number of graphite atoms of different substrate temperatures at 100 m/s, 10 Å depth. The total force values are 2254 nN, 2188 nN, 1868 nN, and 1859 nN, correlating to 300 K, 600 K, 900 K, and 1200 K. The force slightly reduces when raising the substrate temperature because the substrate becomes softer at a higher temperature 21 23 . At a higher temperature, the atoms vibrate at a faster rate, the bonding strength between them is weakened, leading to a softer material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If they do, they seldom disclose how they parametrized the thermostat or justify why they chose the particular parametrization. Without any claim to completeness, we list some examples of otherwise high-quality simulations that are very likely under-thermostated due to base thermostating or possibly overthermostated due to full thermostating. Out of these examples, it seems that only Shiari et al are aware of some implications of their simplified thermostating efforts and concede that another group reported that material removal is greatly influenced by the thermal conditions in the shear zone…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%