2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature extremes, global warming, and armed conflict: new insights from high resolution data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two types of pundits oppose fossil fuels for two entirely different reasons. First group opposes fossil fuels due to climate change, global warming and air pollution 71‐73 . Second group opposes fossil fuels due to oil peaking and fear of finite fossil fuels depletion over time in near future 74‐76 .…”
Section: Future Of Fossil Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two types of pundits oppose fossil fuels for two entirely different reasons. First group opposes fossil fuels due to climate change, global warming and air pollution 71‐73 . Second group opposes fossil fuels due to oil peaking and fear of finite fossil fuels depletion over time in near future 74‐76 .…”
Section: Future Of Fossil Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First group opposes fossil fuels due to climate change, global warming and air pollution. [71][72][73] Second group opposes fossil fuels due to oil peaking and fear of finite fossil fuels depletion over time in near future. [74][75][76] Peak oil theory failed after discovery of shale gas technologies and rampant rise of heat waves, arctic melting and hurricanes.…”
Section: Future Of Fossil Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schleussner et al, 2016; von Uexkull et al, 2016; Ide et al, 2020), high agricultural dependence (e.g. Schilling et al, 2012; Salehyan & Hendrix, 2014; Bretthauer, 2015), and population dynamics (Breckner & Sunde, 2019). Even so, concerns about insufficient consideration of scope conditions, theoretically as well as empirically, continue to trouble scholars, and calls for further progress in modeling conditional relationships and accounting for actor- and location-specific vulnerability are equally prominent in literature reviews today.…”
Section: Seven Historical Priorities For Climate–conflict Research and Their Influence On The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…), is inherently challenging, and empirical responses to this research priority to date are limited. However, a few recent studies provide examples of how multidecadal changes in climatic conditions might be systematically compared to shifting conflict trajectories (Burke, Hsiang & Miguel, 2015; Breckner & Sunde, 2019; van Weezel, 2020). Besides, the climate change research community has made important progress in developing methods to attribute singular events to anthropogenic climate change (Stott et al, 2016), which provides new opportunities for systematic impact attribution of armed conflicts in the future.…”
Section: Seven Historical Priorities For Climate–conflict Research and Their Influence On The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent studies on the disaster-conflict nexus lean towards the positive relationship between the two events, but the relationship is nuanced and the nexus is conditioned by various factors including economic, political, social, and psychological factors (Breckner and Sunde, 2019;Ide et al, 2014;Koubi, 2019;Van Baalen and Mobjo¨rk, 2018;Van Weezel, 2019). These scholars do not deny that disasters tend to increase conflict but focus on the mechanisms through which this occurs, including heavy dependence on agriculture (Von Uexkull et al, 2016), decreased agricultural production (Crost et al, 2018), decreased food availability and the strategic choice of insurgents to preemptively seize civilian food (Bagozzi et al, 2017), migration (Brzoska and Fro¨hlich, 2016), political marginalization (Raleigh, 2010), food insecurity and the weak institutional and structural vulnerability of states (Jones et al, 2017), and the psychological tendency of disaster victims to avoid loss (Bell and Keys, 2016).…”
Section: Natural Disasters-civil Conflict Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%