1991
DOI: 10.1080/10402009108982074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Maps for Frictional Heating in Dry Sliding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
129
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
129
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased normal load to 6 N slightly decreases the mean friction coefficient of the epoxy to about 0.61. The sliding of a steel counterpart on a polymer can cause localized softening or melting of the polymer so that the molten materials can be transferred onto the surface of the counterpart to form a transfer layer [18][19][20]. The transferred polymer layer can reduce the friction coefficient by changing the rubbing mode from the metal-on-polymer to the polymer-on-polymer during the sliding [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased normal load to 6 N slightly decreases the mean friction coefficient of the epoxy to about 0.61. The sliding of a steel counterpart on a polymer can cause localized softening or melting of the polymer so that the molten materials can be transferred onto the surface of the counterpart to form a transfer layer [18][19][20]. The transferred polymer layer can reduce the friction coefficient by changing the rubbing mode from the metal-on-polymer to the polymer-on-polymer during the sliding [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact was corroborated by Raman laser spectroscopy. These authors considered that this phenomenon occurred as consequence of large flash temperatures at the contact points between the tribopairs and used the equation proposed by Ashby et al [45] for evaluating this temperature, which resulted in a value of ΔT $300 1C.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As found in Figure 5A, the friction coefficient of the nanocomposite film co-incorporated with 4 wt% MWCNTs and 2 wt% SiO 2 -MPs is about 0.591 that is higher than that of the PMMA film, indicating that the co-incorporation of MWCNTs and SiO 2 -MPs increases the friction of the nanocomposite film. The incorporation of MWCNTs should reduce the friction of the nanocomposite film due to the solid lubricating effect of the MWCNTs [6,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. However, the increased friction of the nanocomposite film ( Figure 5A) clearly shows that the solid lubricating effect of the MWCNTs on the friction of the nanocomposite film is not significant in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, the increased friction of the nanocomposite film ( Figure 5A) clearly shows that the solid lubricating effect of the MWCNTs on the friction of the nanocomposite film is not significant in this study. In addition, the surface wear can release filler aggregates to the interface between the steel ball and nanocomposite film during the sliding and reduce the friction of the nanocomposite film via the free-rolling of the aggregates [6,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The increased friction of the nanocomposite film associated with the co-incorporation of MWCNTs and SiO 2 -MPs clearly indicates that the fillers do not have the freerolling effect on the friction of the nanocomposite film.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation