2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Measurements for the Tool Wear and Hole Quality Assessment During Drilling of CFRP/CFRP Stacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the heat quantity generated at the Ti volume acts as a heat source to keep temperature at the frontier as high as possible while the CFRP free surface seems to favor heat loss and create The chip generated from the CFRP phase does not appear because the "element deletion" option was used to simulate the material removal process when any of the damage criteria defined above (Table 1) were reached. However, the cutting process yields a continuous chip from the Ti phase which fits with the physical mechanisms widely observed when cutting titanium [17][18][19][20]. When investigating the predicted fields at the CFRP interface side, it can be pointed out that even after tool passage, temperature still localizes at relatively high values along the trim plane-to-interface common edge.…”
Section: 𝜃 = 0°supporting
confidence: 70%
“…In fact, the heat quantity generated at the Ti volume acts as a heat source to keep temperature at the frontier as high as possible while the CFRP free surface seems to favor heat loss and create The chip generated from the CFRP phase does not appear because the "element deletion" option was used to simulate the material removal process when any of the damage criteria defined above (Table 1) were reached. However, the cutting process yields a continuous chip from the Ti phase which fits with the physical mechanisms widely observed when cutting titanium [17][18][19][20]. When investigating the predicted fields at the CFRP interface side, it can be pointed out that even after tool passage, temperature still localizes at relatively high values along the trim plane-to-interface common edge.…”
Section: 𝜃 = 0°supporting
confidence: 70%
“…26 Push-out delamination size can reach up to 2-3 times that of hole size [27][28][29][30] and has been shown to reduce bending strength by up to 20% in CFRP 28 and tensile strength by up to 10% in GFRP. 31 The temperatures during dry drilling actions in fibre reinforced laminates are observed to be high, due to the poor thermal conductivity of the matrices 19,[32][33][34][35][36] and have been shown to increase with tool wear (CER). 24,37 In most cases temperatures have exceeded the matrix glass transition temperature (tg), which reduces interlaminar strength (reducing critical load for push-out delamination) and reduces support for fibres being cut (increasing fibre pull out and fibre bending).…”
Section: Tool Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger the cutting speed, the worse the R a and R z parameters are in both composites. The higher speeds often result in higher cutting power and, therefore, in higher cutting temperatures; thus, there is a possibility that the matrix is more likely to plastically deform and smear instead of being cut [39]. Furthermore, the surface was rougher in the BFRP than in the CFRP.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%