1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf02659856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tempering of Mn and Mn-Si-V Dual-Phase Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During tempering, some carbon atoms migrate to dislocations, effectively pinning them and causing the increase in yield strength and the reappearance of a defined yield point. This was also seen by Speich et al [ 46] on the tempering of Mn and Mn-Si-V dual-phase steels. Tempering also relieved the stress in the martensite caused by the lattice shear.…”
Section: Effect Of Temperingsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…During tempering, some carbon atoms migrate to dislocations, effectively pinning them and causing the increase in yield strength and the reappearance of a defined yield point. This was also seen by Speich et al [ 46] on the tempering of Mn and Mn-Si-V dual-phase steels. Tempering also relieved the stress in the martensite caused by the lattice shear.…”
Section: Effect Of Temperingsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In some cases, the DP steels produced thus may subsequently be subjected to overaging, galvanising or galvannealing treatments, depending on the final application. These treatments essentially amount to tempering of the DP microstructure albeit for very short durations, typically 60-360 s. 1 Though some prior research has been conducted to understand the effect of tempering on the mechanical properties of DP steels, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] in most of these studies, tempering was carried out for 30-60 min. [2][3][4][5] Moreover, the changes in mechanical properties, especially yield strength and ductility reported in these studies, are inconsistent with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] Moreover, the changes in mechanical properties, especially yield strength and ductility reported in these studies, are inconsistent with each other. While some researchers [4][5][6]8 have reported a decrease in yield strength on tempering and have justified it to be a result commensurate with the tempering characteristics of martensite, others 2,3,7,[9][10][11] have reported an increase in yield strength, attributing it to factors like return of discontinuous yielding, reduction in residual stresses in ferrite and formation of microalloy carbides in ferrite. With respect to ductility, while most of the existing literature report an increase in ductility on tempering, some studies also report a loss of ductility, 9,11 attributing it to the decomposition of retained austenite to bainite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method for processing of DP steels (say, Route B) involves, first slow cooling from fully austenitic region up to the desired ferrite transformation temperature, followed by quenching to room temperature for transforming the remaining austenite to martensite. 26,[83][84][85][86][87] The properties obtained by this route (Route B) include lesser tensile strength and higher ductility than the first method (Route A). This is attributed to the large austenite grain size obtained by Route B than Route A.…”
Section: Processing Of Dp Steelsmentioning
confidence: 99%