2005
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tempo sensitivity in isochronous tone sequences: The multiple-look model revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
94
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
19
94
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In most studies using this method, intervals last between 250 msec and 1 sec. With this method, it has been shown that using multiple-instead of single-interval presentations improves discrimination (Drake & Botte, 1993), and that this improvement depends not only on the number of intervals in the first sequence (usually standard), but also on the number of intervals in the second (comparison intervals) sequence (McAuley & Miller, 2007;Miller & McAuley, 2005). Indeed, depending on the modality of stimuli marking sequences, it looks as if increasing the number of comparison intervals, regardless of whether they are presented first or second, is the key factor affecting discrimination (Grondin & McAuley, 2009).…”
Section: Specific Investigation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most studies using this method, intervals last between 250 msec and 1 sec. With this method, it has been shown that using multiple-instead of single-interval presentations improves discrimination (Drake & Botte, 1993), and that this improvement depends not only on the number of intervals in the first sequence (usually standard), but also on the number of intervals in the second (comparison intervals) sequence (McAuley & Miller, 2007;Miller & McAuley, 2005). Indeed, depending on the modality of stimuli marking sequences, it looks as if increasing the number of comparison intervals, regardless of whether they are presented first or second, is the key factor affecting discrimination (Grondin & McAuley, 2009).…”
Section: Specific Investigation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a more global level, average event rate-determined over an extended time period-conveys to individuals information about the overall (global) pace of environmental events. This article continues a line of research concerned with the nature of the mechanism(s) underpinning human timing and the role that local and global temporal context play in time judgment behavior (Jones & McAuley, 2005;McAuley & Jones, 2003;McAuley & Kidd, 1998;Miller & McAuley, 2005). Of particular interest in the present research is the issue of global pace in the auditory domain and how it may affect the listener's sensitivity to local sequence tempo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Assessments of tempo sensitivity using isochronous sequences generally show that as the number of sequence intervals increases, participants' tempo sensitivities improve (Drake & Botte, 1993;Grondin, 2001;McAuley & Kidd, 1998). For a limited range of time intervals, relative just-noticeable differences (JNDs) for both tempo and duration typically average 6% for single-interval (two-tone) sequences (Abel, 1972;Allan, 1979;Creelman, 1962;Getty, 1975;Miller & McAuley, 2005;Small & Campbell, 1962;Woodrow, 1951), whereas JNDs for multiple-interval sequences are sometimes less than about 2% (Drake & Botte, 1993;Friberg & Sundberg, 1995;Michon, 1964).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That participants will be able to discriminate and properly rank the tempos of original and temporally manipulated unimodal auditory stimuli. This is essentially a baseline condition, as our ability to make tempo discriminations amongst artificial and real musical stimuli is already well established (Miller & McAuley 2005;Honing 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%