1998
DOI: 10.1006/ecss.1998.0364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Planktonic Rotifers in the Elbe Estuary during Spring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental matching (BEST), as per the PRIMER analysis ( Table 2), showed that temperature, conductivity, salinity and phosphate were the best combination of variables that determined the abundance and distribution of rotifers in Vembanad estuary with a rho value of 0.86 (Table 2). Salinity gradient and conductivity are known to be important factors limiting the growth of planktonic rotifer populations in the Vembanad estuary, which was in agreement with the studies of Holst et al (1998). Shiel (1979), while studying rotifers of the South Australia, also observed that no single factor can be defined as limiting, but increasing salinity had the most marked impact on the rotifer population, when a decrease in species diversity was recorded.…”
Section: Rotiferssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Environmental matching (BEST), as per the PRIMER analysis ( Table 2), showed that temperature, conductivity, salinity and phosphate were the best combination of variables that determined the abundance and distribution of rotifers in Vembanad estuary with a rho value of 0.86 (Table 2). Salinity gradient and conductivity are known to be important factors limiting the growth of planktonic rotifer populations in the Vembanad estuary, which was in agreement with the studies of Holst et al (1998). Shiel (1979), while studying rotifers of the South Australia, also observed that no single factor can be defined as limiting, but increasing salinity had the most marked impact on the rotifer population, when a decrease in species diversity was recorded.…”
Section: Rotiferssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Differently from the above-cited literature, freshwater species are not displaced by saline ones at the river mouth of the Alcantara River, during the study period, probably because conductivity remains in a freshwater range, representing a salinity barrier to marine species. This is also confirmed by the absence of brackish water genera, such as Synchaeta (Hartmut et al, 1990;Gallegos, 1991, 1992;Lopes, 1994;Gaughan and Potter, 1995;Holst et al, 1998). The abundance pattern found in Alcantara River is consistent with groups separated by cluster analysis, in which it may be distinguished an upstream community, characterized by low densities; an intermediate and a downstream communities with increasing abundance patterns, that reached the maximum at the river mouth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Synchaeta sp. has also been found abundant in spring to early summer (Elliott 1977;Holst et al 1998), while Ploesoma truncatum showed higher abundance in summer according to Berzins & Pejler (1989) and Ferrara et al (2002). Finally, Gastropus stylifer was present from spring to autumn in the study area, as in Lake Trichonis (Doulka & Kehayias 2008).…”
Section: Seasonal Variability Of Zooplanktonmentioning
confidence: 69%