2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and spatial variability of groundwater–surface water fluxes: Development and application of an analytical method using temperature time series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
487
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 507 publications
(518 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
487
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The bottom and top boundaries are constant head boundaries, left and right boundaries are no-flow boundaries, leading to vertical flow through the system. Although the assumption of vertical groundwater discharge seems rigid for complex stream-aquifer systems it is commonly made for the interpretation of groundwater fluxes through the streambed (e.g., Cardenas and Wilson, 2007;Keery et al, 2007). The constant head values were chosen such that for each simulation the mean groundwater flux through the model equalled the mean flux through the streambed calculated from the observed temperature profiles (q z mean=58.2 L m −2 d −1 ).…”
Section: Model Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottom and top boundaries are constant head boundaries, left and right boundaries are no-flow boundaries, leading to vertical flow through the system. Although the assumption of vertical groundwater discharge seems rigid for complex stream-aquifer systems it is commonly made for the interpretation of groundwater fluxes through the streambed (e.g., Cardenas and Wilson, 2007;Keery et al, 2007). The constant head values were chosen such that for each simulation the mean groundwater flux through the model equalled the mean flux through the streambed calculated from the observed temperature profiles (q z mean=58.2 L m −2 d −1 ).…”
Section: Model Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combined our temperature time-series data with an analytical solution to quantify baseflow velocities at each of the measurement sites (Hatch et al, 2006). Streambed temperatures and their lagged thermal response to surface conditions can be used to calculate groundwater velocities in both gaining and losing streams as long as the vertical separation is known (Hatch et al, 2006; see also Keery et al, 2007, for further discussion of a similar method). Daily velocities may be calculated for a given time series of streambed temperatures using either (1) the ratio of decreasing amplitude in the daily streambed temperature sig-nal with depth or (2) the phase shift in the timing of the peak measured temperature with depth.…”
Section: Stream Discharge and Temperature Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the erroneous temporal spreading of advective velocities and significant anomalies induced by signal-processes techniques, such as Fourier transform and Dynamic Harmonic Regression (Hatch et al, 2006;Keery et al, 2007), our computer program directly extracted sinusoidal temperature signals from noisy raw temperature records without filtering. As a result of 15 the decline of energy with depth, some low energy oscillations became linear (i.e.…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of conduction and convection, heat is a naturally occurring tracer in stream systems, with daily temperature fluctuations within a SW body leading to temperature responses in the sediments at the SW-GW interface (Constantz, 2008). By measuring streambed temperatures in an environment with significant differences in groundwater and surface water temperatures, the propagation of a heat signal by conduction and convection heat fluxes can be 25 used as a proxy to indicate exchange flow directions or to quantify exchange fluxes (Hatch et al, 2006;Keery et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%