2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00933-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal asymmetry in spike timing-dependent synaptic plasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Asymmetric learning windows have repeatedly been found experimentally (e.g. see [11][12][13]). This asymmetry is a prerequisite, at least in phase oscillator networks, to observe the coexistence of states characterized by different levels of synchrony [3,3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Asymmetric learning windows have repeatedly been found experimentally (e.g. see [11][12][13]). This asymmetry is a prerequisite, at least in phase oscillator networks, to observe the coexistence of states characterized by different levels of synchrony [3,3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Studies in different brain regions and under varying experimental conditions have revealed a plethora of different types of STDP (7). Experimental protocols using a diversity of spike patterns have furthermore highlighted the complexity and nonlinearity of plasticity rules in different systems (6,(8)(9)(10)(11). However, how the diversity and nonlinearity of plasticity results emerge from the interplay between the underlying biochemical synaptic machinery and activity patterns remains elusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the highly nonlinear involvement of postsynaptic spike times and PSP in the optimal synaptic update rule, a simple interpretation in terms of pairs or pre-and postsynaptic spikes as in many standard models of synaptic plasticity (30,31) can only capture a small portion of synaptic plasticity phenomena. The optimal learning rule suggests that nonlinear phenomena (32)(33)(34)(35) are potentially highly relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%