2013
DOI: 10.1121/1.4824157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal coherence of the acoustic field forward propagated through a continental shelf with random internal waves

Abstract: An analytical model derived from normal mode theory for the accumulated effects of range-dependent multiple forward scattering is applied to estimate the temporal coherence of the acoustic field forward propagated through a continental-shelf waveguide containing random three-dimensional internal waves. The modeled coherence time scale of narrow band low-frequency acoustic field fluctuations after propagating through a continental-shelf waveguide is shown to decay with a power-law of range to the À1/2 beyond ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formulation used here for modeling attenuation combines waveguide scattering theory [7,8] and a differential slab marching approach introduced by Rayleigh for the mean field to derive the first two statistical moments of the acoustic field in a waveguide with inhomogeneities [5]. This formulation has been previously shown to be consistent with experimental measurements of attenuation and temporal coherence loss in the presence of internal waves for both mid-frequency signals (415 Hz) in a continental shelf environment and low-frequency signals (10-70 Hz) in a deep ocean waveguide [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formulation used here for modeling attenuation combines waveguide scattering theory [7,8] and a differential slab marching approach introduced by Rayleigh for the mean field to derive the first two statistical moments of the acoustic field in a waveguide with inhomogeneities [5]. This formulation has been previously shown to be consistent with experimental measurements of attenuation and temporal coherence loss in the presence of internal waves for both mid-frequency signals (415 Hz) in a continental shelf environment and low-frequency signals (10-70 Hz) in a deep ocean waveguide [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Scattering strength and attenuation are modeled for each fish species and environment and we search for the sensing frequency that maximizes scattering strength uncorrected for two-way attenuation from fish (SS − ∆SPL 2way ), which in turn maximizes the detection range of the sensing system. Here SS is modeled using Equation (15) and ∆SPL 2way is modeled using Equation (11).…”
Section: Attenuation Prediction and Frequency Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeled coherence time scale of narrow-band low-frequency acoustic field fluctuations after propagating through a continental-shelf waveguide is shown to decay with a power-law of range to the -1/2 beyond roughly 1 km, to decrease with increasing internal wave energy, and to be consistent with measured acoustic coherence time scales. The model should provide a useful prediction of the acoustic coherence time scale as a function of internal wave energy in continental-shelf environments (Gong et al, 2013). The acoustic coherence time scale is an important parameter in remote sensing applications because it determines (i) the time window within which standard coherent processing such as matched filtering may be conducted, and (ii) the number of statistically independent fluctuations in a given measurement period that determines the variance reduction possible by stationary averaging.…”
Section: Work Completedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paper on the topic of acoustic field temporal coherence time scales in internal-wave filled continental-shelf waveguides has been finished (Gong et al, 2013). Coherence times for order 400-Hz sound are predicted to range from roughly 2 to 20 minutes depending upon environmental conditions.…”
Section: Stochastic Acoustic Modeling (Makris)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensembles of dynamical ocean models that are properly formulated for specific dynamical processes can also be used to define the statistics of those processes. Statistics of the acoustic field can be computed and then examined by feeding the ocean statistics (model-or data-derived) into statistical acoustic models (Flatté et al 1979;Colosi and Morozov 2009;Colosi et al 2012bColosi et al , 2013Gong et al 2013;White et al 2013;Raghukumar and Colosi 2014;Rouseff and Lunkov 2015;Colosi 2016).…”
Section: Statistical Ocean Model and Statistical Acoustics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%