2010
DOI: 10.3354/meps08655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal dynamics of fish assemblages of natural and artificial tropical estuaries

Abstract: We sampled the fish fauna of 9 small natural estuaries and 2 constructed estuarine lakes in Australia's dry tropics over 15 mo to detail the dynamics of fish assembly structures over time. The estuaries chosen were small enough that the cast net sampling method which we used could cover the full extent of the estuary, obviating the problem that within-estuary migration might lead to the false appearance of assemblage change over time. Temporal patterns in assemblage structure were consistent across the natural… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, while species clearly de pend on these habitats during juvenile life stages, this does not imply that all nearshore habitats function equally in their nursery potential (Gillanders et al 2003, Sheaves 2005, Sheaves et al 2010, Kimirei et al 2011, Huijbers et al 2013). The present study re vealed high 233 Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, while species clearly de pend on these habitats during juvenile life stages, this does not imply that all nearshore habitats function equally in their nursery potential (Gillanders et al 2003, Sheaves 2005, Sheaves et al 2010, Kimirei et al 2011, Huijbers et al 2013). The present study re vealed high 233 Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study area, and evaluating the abundance of T. lanceolata was difficult because the species has dramatically declined over the past few decades. Thus, to obtain the reliable presence/absence data for T. lanceolata and other fish, we combined several general methods of fish sampling: minnow traps, cast-nets, electroshocker, and hand-nets (Katano et al, 2006;Kitamura, 2007;Sheaves et al, 2010). First, four baited minnow traps (length 50 cm, width 25 cm, height 25 cm, and 4-mm mesh) were set on the bottom substrate at 5-m intervals along the bank for 1 h, and a cast-net (2-m radius with 5-mm mesh) was thrown at least three times.…”
Section: Fish Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final tree models were selected based on a scree plot of explained variance, with tree size pruned at the point where the proportion of variance explained began to noticeably tail off. mCART analysis is accepted as a simple and robust technique for modelling ecological data (De'ath & Fabricius 2000) and has been used previously to explain nekton assemblage structure (Sheaves et al 2010). Initially, a tree was constructed using pool codes (consisting of network and pool number; see Fig.…”
Section: Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%