2020
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00401-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal, Environmental, and Biological Drivers of the Mucosal Microbiome in a Wild Marine Fish, Scomber japonicus

Abstract: Changing ocean conditions driven by anthropogenic activities may have a negative impact on fisheries by increasing stress and disease. To understand how environment and host biology drives mucosal microbiomes in a marine fish, we surveyed five body sites (gill, skin, digesta, gastrointestinal tract [GI], and pyloric ceca) from 229 Pacific chub mackerel, Scomber japonicus, collected across 38 time points spanning 1 year from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Pier (La Jolla, CA). Mucosal sites had unique m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gill and stomach mucosae shared the core bacterial genera, including Sphingomonas, Ralstonia, unclassified Comamonadaceae, and Pelomonas, all of which were aerobic microorganisms [49][50][51][52]. This finding suggested that both the gill and stomach mucosae had high oxygen levels, which was consistent with adequate exposure to the environment at the two sites [10]. However, further study is required to explain the similarity between the gill and stomach mucosal microbiota observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The gill and stomach mucosae shared the core bacterial genera, including Sphingomonas, Ralstonia, unclassified Comamonadaceae, and Pelomonas, all of which were aerobic microorganisms [49][50][51][52]. This finding suggested that both the gill and stomach mucosae had high oxygen levels, which was consistent with adequate exposure to the environment at the two sites [10]. However, further study is required to explain the similarity between the gill and stomach mucosal microbiota observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Such significant differences in microbial structure led to significant differences in microbial function, which could be attributed to the functional heterogeneity of the gastrointestinal tract, because the stomach is the main site of diet fermentation and the hindgut plays an important role in nutrient absorption [ 38 ]. No significant differences were found in the bacterial community structure and composition between the stomach and gill mucosae, which might have been due to the similarity of mucosal niches between these two sites [ 10 ]. In addition, three mucosa sites had no significant differences in terms of microbial diversity and displayed a lower microbial diversity compared with the digesta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Presence of adult flukes in heart and egg densities within the gill were measured per fish as previously described ( Aiken et al, 2006 ; Power et al, 2019 ). Comparison of the SBT microbiome to other fish samples, including Pacific chub mackerel (MKL) ( Minich et al, 2020b ) and yellowtail kingfish (YTK), was performed computationally within Qiita ( Gonzalez et al, 2018 ). All MKL samples were collected from the wild while the YTK were farmed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammals, corals and, to a lesser extent, fish have been primarily targeted by marine microbiologists in microbiome studies, and we now have a body of evidence that these diverse and abundant microbes play a vital role in the health and fitness of their hosts, participating in functions as important as digestion, defence, and nutrition, among others [1][2][3]. Most such studies show that the composition of these microbial communities remains highly variable and multifactorial and is subject, in a still unclear way, to the influence of different parameters associated with the host, including species [4], age [5], sex [6], and diet [7], as well as external environmental conditions such as salinity [8], seasonality [9], geographical location [10], temperature [11], and chlorophyll a concentration [12]. However, these commensal microbes are not evenly distributed throughout the body of their marine hosts, where similar to those in humans, they form complex bacterial consortia mainly in the digestive tract [13], skin [14], and respiratory system [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%