1997
DOI: 10.1575/1912/5712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal evolution of tritium-�He age in the North Atlantic : implications for thermocline ventilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(178 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is particularly a problem in the bias of data taken in nonwinter months. Robbins [1997] has a thorough evaluation of errors related to interpolation and finds errors will increase with increasing tritium/3He age. Sarmiento [1990], it is possible that in other regions corrections would be larger.…”
Section: Discussion Of Cfc Agesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is particularly a problem in the bias of data taken in nonwinter months. Robbins [1997] has a thorough evaluation of errors related to interpolation and finds errors will increase with increasing tritium/3He age. Sarmiento [1990], it is possible that in other regions corrections would be larger.…”
Section: Discussion Of Cfc Agesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Present analytical uncertainty for CFC-11, CFC-12, and SF 6 is usually less than 3%. When using tracer data, there will be errors related to spatial (Robbins 1997) and temporal resolution. Recent work shows that in regions of high eddy activity, a discrete tracer measurement may be biased by eddy variability (Peacock et al 2005, Waugh & Abraham 2008see below).…”
Section: Shipboard Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First‐order scaling arguments suggest that isopycnal advection and diffusion occur on faster timescales than diapycnal diffusion in the thermocline. This scaling, however, does not account for complex, three‐dimensional circulation patterns (e.g., the vertical shear in the advective flow) which could enhance the effects of diapycnal diffusion [ Robbins , 1997]. However, in model runs including diapycnal diffusion, diffusivities on the order of 10 −5 m 2 s −1 (Figure 6b) do not, indeed, significantly alter the tracer distributions on σ θ = 26.0 kg m −3 based on advection only (Figure 6a).…”
Section: Role Of Diffusion and Outcrop Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%