1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02513368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal feature estimation during walking using miniature accelerometers: an analysis of gait improvement after hip arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
103
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these approaches do not yield an exact identification of individual stride cycles such as required for the analysis of mean electromyography (EMG) signals or angular joint movements. Successive foot contacts can be detected from accelerations of the thigh, foot or shank [14,15]. However, this detection is not always easy [15], and, even if foot contacts are successfully detected, it may not always be possible or practical to mount accelerometers on both legs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches do not yield an exact identification of individual stride cycles such as required for the analysis of mean electromyography (EMG) signals or angular joint movements. Successive foot contacts can be detected from accelerations of the thigh, foot or shank [14,15]. However, this detection is not always easy [15], and, even if foot contacts are successfully detected, it may not always be possible or practical to mount accelerometers on both legs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average gait speed of approximately 1 m/s three months after surgery were also reported in [30]. According to [31] the greatest improvements in gait speed are observed within the first three months post-op.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed method with regards to previous approaches, a peakdetection based method for detecting HS and TO was implemented [28]. This method was chosen over a more recent work [6] because it is based on the same principles but seems to be less dependent on optimizing parameters, and therefore more robust to different data sets.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was chosen over a more recent work [6] because it is based on the same principles but seems to be less dependent on optimizing parameters, and therefore more robust to different data sets. The method presented in [28] was implemented with a slight modification in order to cope with difference in sensor placement. At each iteration, the interval used to narrow down on the location of the peaks was changed to a window ten-samplewide centered at the previous peak location.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%