2010
DOI: 10.3109/00016481003591731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal fine structure in cochlear implants: Preliminary speech perception results in Cantonese-speaking implant users

Abstract: Mean tone identification scores in 12 subjects were 59.2% with CIS and 59.2% with fine structure stimulation using 4 TFS channels, mean scores of CHINT sentences in 8 subjects were 54.2% with CIS and 55.9% with TFS stimulation. Differences between the two strategies were not significant for any speech test. Two additional versions of TFS strategy and pulse rates were tested in six subjects. No significant differences between strategies were found.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, transmitting more fine structure through cochlear implants to users might be an effective approach to improving pitch perception for them (e.g., Nie et al 2005). So far, however, little evidence has shown that any of the fine-structure strategies would make a dramatic improvement for lexical tone perception or music perception in cochlear implant users (e.g., Riss et al 2008Riss et al , 2009Han et al 2009;Firszt et al 2009;Schatzer et al 2010). Many studies have shown that cochlear implant users could only detect differences in pitch for frequencies up to about 300 Hz (e.g., Shannon 1983; Zeng 2002), which is much poorer than that observed in normal-hearing listeners (Carlyon and Deeks 2002).…”
Section: Implications For Cochlear Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, transmitting more fine structure through cochlear implants to users might be an effective approach to improving pitch perception for them (e.g., Nie et al 2005). So far, however, little evidence has shown that any of the fine-structure strategies would make a dramatic improvement for lexical tone perception or music perception in cochlear implant users (e.g., Riss et al 2008Riss et al , 2009Han et al 2009;Firszt et al 2009;Schatzer et al 2010). Many studies have shown that cochlear implant users could only detect differences in pitch for frequencies up to about 300 Hz (e.g., Shannon 1983; Zeng 2002), which is much poorer than that observed in normal-hearing listeners (Carlyon and Deeks 2002).…”
Section: Implications For Cochlear Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And a few words about the CI patients who use the frequency range from 70 Hz. It should be noted that a FS-4 strategy that is designed specifically for low frequency range has no advantage compared with CIS [5]. It should be emphasized that this study was conducted in the Chinese, where the expected effect of FS-4 had to be displayed more clearly.…”
Section: The Results and Their Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To deliver perceptible temporal cues to CI users, Nie et al proposed to transform temporal fine structure into frequency modulation information and uses it to frequency modulate the pulse rate [28]. The Fine Structure Processing strategy bases the pulse triggering pattern in a particular channel on the zero crossings of the respective band waveform [29]. Alternatively, the F0mod [30], [31] strategy modulates channel envelopes at the input sound's to enhance temporal pitch cues.…”
Section: Improved Perception Of Music With a Harmonicmentioning
confidence: 99%