No abstract

Mean tone identification scores in 12 subjects were 59.2% with CIS and 59.2% with fine structure stimulation using 4 TFS channels, mean scores of CHINT sentences in 8 subjects were 54.2% with CIS and 55.9% with TFS stimulation. Differences between the two strategies were not significant for any speech test. Two additional versions of TFS strategy and pulse rates were tested in six subjects. No significant differences between strategies were found.

The results firstly indicate that the material is homogenous enough for use as a speech test in clinical work and research. Secondly, to assess the discrimination performance for individual tones, d' values outperform the simple proportion of correct responses.

Both experimental coding strategies improved tone identification by approximately 11 percentage points. This improvement was significant in the female speaker test. Sentence perception, as assessed with the M-HINT test, and quality of life scores were identical with all three coding strategies.

No abstract