Current Ornithology 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9915-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Flexibility in Avian Reproduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
122
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
6
122
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Not all species exhibit such variation in GnRH content in relation to reproductive state (see Ball and Hahn, 1997, Dawson et al, 2001, Pereyra et al, 2005. Initially it appeared as if the degree of seasonal GnRH plasticity was associated with variation in the onset of photorefractoriness (Ball andHahn, 1997, Hahn et al, 1997), but recent work has defined a set of general rules influencing plasticity (Pereyra et al 2005). In particular, comparative studies of cardueline finches with diverse photoperiod response patterns suggest that GnRH plasticity tends to be observed in species that do exhibit gonadal regression while still experiencing long daylengths that were previously able to stimulate gonadal growth (Pereyra et al 2005, Macdougall-Shackleton et al, 2006.…”
Section: Seasonal Changes In the Gnrh In Relation To Variation In Brementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all species exhibit such variation in GnRH content in relation to reproductive state (see Ball and Hahn, 1997, Dawson et al, 2001, Pereyra et al, 2005. Initially it appeared as if the degree of seasonal GnRH plasticity was associated with variation in the onset of photorefractoriness (Ball andHahn, 1997, Hahn et al, 1997), but recent work has defined a set of general rules influencing plasticity (Pereyra et al 2005). In particular, comparative studies of cardueline finches with diverse photoperiod response patterns suggest that GnRH plasticity tends to be observed in species that do exhibit gonadal regression while still experiencing long daylengths that were previously able to stimulate gonadal growth (Pereyra et al 2005, Macdougall-Shackleton et al, 2006.…”
Section: Seasonal Changes In the Gnrh In Relation To Variation In Brementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although large changes in behavior, gonadal physiology, and peripheral endocrine physiology occur in a variety of animals, birds are unusual in the degree to which these changes can be underlain by similarly dramatic changes within the neuroendocrine machinery itself. During absolute photorefractoriness, the down-regulation of the septo-infundibular GnRH system is profound Hahn et al, 1997;Dawson et al, 2001). In the few temperate zone taxa that do not become absolutely photorefractory (i.e., Japanese quail, crossbills; Robinson and Follett, 1982;Hahn et al, 2004), down-regulation of the GnRH system does not occur, even though the birds may be relatively refractory (Foster et al, 1987;Pereyra et al, in press; see Nicholls et al, 1988).…”
Section: Photoperiodic Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the few temperate zone taxa that do not become absolutely photorefractory (i.e., Japanese quail, crossbills; Robinson and Follett, 1982;Hahn et al, 2004), down-regulation of the GnRH system does not occur, even though the birds may be relatively refractory (Foster et al, 1987;Pereyra et al, in press; see Nicholls et al, 1988). Stimulation of the reproductive axis can enhance activity of the GnRH system (e.g., Saldanha et al, 1994a), but the most pronounced changes occur during development and dissipation of absolute refractoriness Hahn et al, 1997;Sharp, 1996).…”
Section: Photoperiodic Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimate factors, such as food availability, weather, competition or predation, favor individuals that reproduce when changes in the environment occur. Therefore, animals must prepare for changes in the environment by responding to proximate cues, which are features of the environment that actually influence physiology or behavior (Hahn et al, 1997). Proximate cues can be predictive, such as changes in photoperiod (Wingfield, 1983), or supplementary, such as changes in weather (Hahn et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, animals must prepare for changes in the environment by responding to proximate cues, which are features of the environment that actually influence physiology or behavior (Hahn et al, 1997). Proximate cues can be predictive, such as changes in photoperiod (Wingfield, 1983), or supplementary, such as changes in weather (Hahn et al, 1997). Predictive cues help regulate sex steroids production, which in turn, regulates reproductive behaviors in a variety of taxa including birds (Noble, 1973;Delville and Balthazart, 1987;Ball and Balthazart, 2002), fish (Tricas et al, 2000, Grober andBass, 2002), mammals (Hull et al, 2002;Blaustein and Erskine, 2002), reptiles (Alderete et al, 1980;Rhen et al, 1999;Godwin and Crews, 2002) and amphibians (Diakow and Nemiroff, 1981;Schmidt, 1984Schmidt, , 1985Mendonça et al, 1985;Boyd, 1994, Wilczynski and.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%