2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icdm.2008.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal-Relational Classifiers for Prediction in Evolving Domains

Abstract: Many relational domains contain temporal information and dynamics that are important to model (e.g., social networks, protein networks). However, past work in relational learning has focused primarily on modeling static "snapshots" of the data and has largely ignored the temporal dimension of these data. In this work, we extend relational techniques to temporally-evolving domains and outline a representational framework that is capable of modeling both temporal and relational dependencies in the data. We devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we have timestamped (year of publication) data detailing the activities (publications) of a person (author) in a community (conference/journal), we can define a measure that reflects all of the above properties by adapting the exponential summarization kernel described in [23]. Let N1, N2 .…”
Section: Gauging Group Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we have timestamped (year of publication) data detailing the activities (publications) of a person (author) in a community (conference/journal), we can define a measure that reflects all of the above properties by adapting the exponential summarization kernel described in [23]. Let N1, N2 .…”
Section: Gauging Group Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since autocorrelation is the primary motivation to use relational and network models over conventional machine learning techniques, it stands to reason that a better understanding of the causes of autocorrelation will inform the development of improved models and learning algorithms. For example, although previous work in relational learning and statistical network analysis has focused primarily on static graphs, recent efforts have turned to the analysis of dynamic networks and development of temporally-evolving models (e.g., [9,21]). In order to deal with the enormous increase in dimensionality associated with modeling both temporal and relational dependencies, these methods restrict the set of dependencies that they consider (e.g., through choice of model form).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, relational classifiers have attempted to use all the data available in a network [18]. However, since the relevance of data may change over time (e.g., links become stale), learning the appropriate temporal granularity (i.e., range of timesteps) can improve classification accuracy.…”
Section: Temporal Granularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work in relational learning on attributed graphs either uses static network snapshots or significantly limits the amount of temporal information incorporated into the models. Sharan et al [18] assumes a strict representation that only uses kernel estimation for link weights, while GA-TVRC [9] uses a genetic algorithm to learn the link weights. SRPTs [11] incorporate temporal and spatial information in the relational attributes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%