2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal, spatial, and ecological modes of evolution of Eurasian Mus based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
171
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
18
171
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These haplotypes include examples of both the MUS group (two haplotypes, nine mice) and the CAS group (three haplotypes, 17 mice). The distribution of the two haplotype groups on Hokkaido is mutually exclusive; CAS group haplotypes Genotypes were referred from Suzuki et al (2004) and Furusawa (2000), respectively. (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These haplotypes include examples of both the MUS group (two haplotypes, nine mice) and the CAS group (three haplotypes, 17 mice). The distribution of the two haplotype groups on Hokkaido is mutually exclusive; CAS group haplotypes Genotypes were referred from Suzuki et al (2004) and Furusawa (2000), respectively. (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyt b sequence analysis The polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing of the cyt b gene were performed according to previously described methods (Suzuki et al, 2004). The doublestranded PCR product was sequenced utilizing the PRISM Ready Reaction DyeDeoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (ABI) and an ABI310 automated sequencer.…”
Section: Terashima Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the closest outgroup is the rather divergent Rattus norvegicus, we did not include the control region in this first tree. The maximum likelihood values were not different enough to determine which of the three most divergent groups separated first, and therefore we left this deepest slip unresolved with the following three branches diverging ( We estimated coalescence times for these branches assuming a divergence time between Mus and Rattus of 12 million yr (paleontological data from Jacobs et al 1989;Jaeger et al 1986in Michaux et al 2002Suzuki et al 2004). The results date the split between the three main groups at 371,000 ‫ע‬ 91,300 yr ago, consistent with published mtDNA data that place the divergence between Mus musculus subspecies between 0.1 Mya (based on Figure 1.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rattus norvegicus was used as an outgroup. mitochondrial cytochrome B) and 0.5 Mya (based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes combined) (Suzuki et al 2004).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%