2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1ee01165k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal-spatial-energy resolved advance multidimensional techniques to probe photovoltaic materials from atomistic viewpoint for next-generation energy solutions

Abstract: Solar cell technologies have attracted great attention in view of their potential to meet world’s energy demands in sustainable fashion. Extensive research efforts have been made to increase the efficiency...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 389 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In here, A 1 and A 2 refer to the decay amplitudes; B signifies a constant about the baseline offset; τ 1 is the speedy decay of trap-mediated carrier nonradiative recombination, while τ 2 tells the lagging decay associated with carrier radiative recombination. The formula τ av = ( A 1 τ 1 2 + A 2 τ 2 2 )/( A 1 τ 1 + A 2 τ 2 ) helps figure out the average PL decay times (τ ave ). , Table displays the fitted results. The lauric acid-treated film shows longer PL decay (τ av = 130.12 ns) than the pristine film (τ av = 44.24 ns); the longer carrier lifetime means the fewer carrier recombinations, which facilitate hole extraction and influence the open-circuit voltage. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In here, A 1 and A 2 refer to the decay amplitudes; B signifies a constant about the baseline offset; τ 1 is the speedy decay of trap-mediated carrier nonradiative recombination, while τ 2 tells the lagging decay associated with carrier radiative recombination. The formula τ av = ( A 1 τ 1 2 + A 2 τ 2 2 )/( A 1 τ 1 + A 2 τ 2 ) helps figure out the average PL decay times (τ ave ). , Table displays the fitted results. The lauric acid-treated film shows longer PL decay (τ av = 130.12 ns) than the pristine film (τ av = 44.24 ns); the longer carrier lifetime means the fewer carrier recombinations, which facilitate hole extraction and influence the open-circuit voltage. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formula τ av = ( A 1 τ 1 2 + A 2 τ 2 2 )/( A 1 τ 1 + A 2 τ 2 ) helps figure out the average PL decay times (τ ave ). , Table displays the fitted results. The lauric acid-treated film shows longer PL decay (τ av = 130.12 ns) than the pristine film (τ av = 44.24 ns); the longer carrier lifetime means the fewer carrier recombinations, which facilitate hole extraction and influence the open-circuit voltage. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional far-field optical spectroscopies have diffraction-limited spatial resolution and are subjected to optical selection rules, thus limiting the study of the near-field response properties of plasmonic nanostructures. Scanning near-field optical microscopy (SNOM) can overcome the diffraction limit by exploiting the properties of evanescent waves but is limited by weak light sources and poor detectors in the IR (∼1–10 μm). , Alternatively, electron-energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) performed in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) can map the near-field responses of plasmonic nanostructures at high-spatial resolution (∼1 nm) across a broad spectral window in a single scan. , The evanescent waves associated with a fast traveling electron beam excite all plasmon modes, dipolar and nondipolar, allowing for the spectral- and spatial-mapping of both bright and dark plasmon modes. , Additionally, recent advancements in monochromators and direct-electron detectors now allow access to low-energy IR excitations with a high signal-to-noise ratio, enabling vibrational spectroscopy with high spatial resolution. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This restriction is especially severe in the mid- and far-infrared, where the wavelengths are 10–100 μm; although, extensive research efforts combined with technological advancements have yielded an ever-growing set of photon-based methods to surpass the diffraction limit. For example, near-field techniques exploit evanescent waves to achieve sub-50 nm spatial resolution , while inelastic spectroscopies such as X-ray scattering (IXS) and vibrational Raman spectroscopy can map vibrational properties of materials with 100–300 nm spatial resolution (Figure ). , Despite these impressive advancements, the subnanometer spatial resolution necessary to map the individual vibrational modes confined to small nanocrystals and material interfaces remains inaccessible using photon-based spectroscopies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) is routinely applied in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) to map the chemical, electronic, and plasmonic properties of materials with subnanometer spatial resolution, , STEM-EELS has historically lacked the energy resolution to resolve individual vibrational modes. In 2014, Krivanek et al employed recent advancements such as the ultrabright cold-field emission guns (FEGs), new monochromator designs, and increased energy dispersion per channel to achieve a record-breaking sub-10 meV energy resolution in a STEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%