2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00054-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal–spatial memory: retrieval of spatial information does not reduce recency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, serial recall of imitation components was assessed by means of free imitation of the stimulus model, as opposed to the constrained, discrete measures used in most other studies. Finally, error is regarded as a continuous variable, rather than a binary one, such as correct or incorrect (see Farrand et al 2001;Rhodes et al 2004). This is arguably more applicable to real-life tasks, which often involve dynamic objects, and are repeated by an observer whose goal is a reproduction that is roughly isomorphic with the model, but not necessarily identical to it (Schaal et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, serial recall of imitation components was assessed by means of free imitation of the stimulus model, as opposed to the constrained, discrete measures used in most other studies. Finally, error is regarded as a continuous variable, rather than a binary one, such as correct or incorrect (see Farrand et al 2001;Rhodes et al 2004). This is arguably more applicable to real-life tasks, which often involve dynamic objects, and are repeated by an observer whose goal is a reproduction that is roughly isomorphic with the model, but not necessarily identical to it (Schaal et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retention is tested immediately after presentation, when all dots are re-presented simultaneously in their original locations and the participants are required to mark them, using a mouse-driven pointer, in their order of presentation. Primacy and recency effects are found in such a task, but more noteworthy is that recency is of a magnitude approaching that found typically in auditory verbal serial recall tasks (Farrand & Jones, 1996;Farrand, Parmentier, & Jones, 2001;Jones et al, 1995). This suggests that marked recency is not a defining characteristic of auditory serial recall; a visuospatial task that requires serial recall may exhibit it also.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In Experiment 1, we sought to test De Lillo's (2004) suggestion of a hierarchical organization based on spatial proximity while avoiding the limitations pointed out above by using the dots task (Farrand & Jones, 1996;Farrand, Parmentier, & Jones, 2001;Jones et al, 1995;Tremblay et al, 2001) rather than the Corsi task, and by including a control condition in which locations did not form spatial groups. We predicted that performance should be best when locations were temporally and spatially proximate, intermediate in the absence of spatial groups, and weakest when temporal and spatial proximity clashed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%