2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal variation in selection on body length and date of return in a wild population of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch

Abstract: BackgroundA number of studies have measured selection in nature to understand how populations adapt to their environment; however, the temporal dynamics of selection are rarely investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the temporal variation in selection by comparing the mode, direction and strength of selection on fitness-related traits between two cohorts of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Specifically, we quantified individual reproductive success and examined selection on date of return and bod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, although selective effects from previous years could have affected our observations, these effects may not have been strong. Selection coefficients estimated previously for adult Pacific salmon have found directional and stabilizing selection on body size (Carlson et al, 2009;Kodama et al, 2012) and directional selection on arrival date to the spawning grounds (Anderson et al, 2010), although modes of selection were often not consistent annually. The selection coefficients estimated here were within the range of estimates obtained in a study of wild coho salmon that also used ZINB regression models, and our sample sizes per brood year and population were of a similar order of magnitude (Kodama et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, although selective effects from previous years could have affected our observations, these effects may not have been strong. Selection coefficients estimated previously for adult Pacific salmon have found directional and stabilizing selection on body size (Carlson et al, 2009;Kodama et al, 2012) and directional selection on arrival date to the spawning grounds (Anderson et al, 2010), although modes of selection were often not consistent annually. The selection coefficients estimated here were within the range of estimates obtained in a study of wild coho salmon that also used ZINB regression models, and our sample sizes per brood year and population were of a similar order of magnitude (Kodama et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to its importance in the marketplace, coho salmon provides a conservation and evolutionary model for study among the salmonids. This species of salmon is strictly anadromous and semelparous, with a shorter generation time and a simpler life history than most other salmonids (Kodama et al 2012), although population dynamics are still actively being examined (Jones et al 2014). We are interested in the increased growth hormone production of the GH + coho salmon strain (Devlin et al 2001) as a model along with its potential differences from wild-types under natural and/or aquaculture stressors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, tissue samples for DNA and phenotypic data have been collected from every adult fish used as broodstock since the inception of the program in 1997. Many of the phenotypic traits measured-length, weight, and dates of return to freshwater and maturation-are correlated with individual fitness (e.g., Kodama, Hard, & Naish, 2012;Schroder et al, 2010;Thorpe, Miles, & Keay, 1984). In addition, these traits have significant additive genetic variation on which selection can act (Carlson & Seamons, 2008;Hard, 2004) and can differ between hatchery and wild populations (e.g., Ford et al, 2006;Hoffnagle, Carmichael, Frenyea, & Keniry, 2008;Knudsen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%