Temporary Agency Work and Well-Being—The Mediating Role of Job Insecurity

Abstract

Organisations use non-standard employment as a means of flexibility and reduction of fixed costs. An increasingly growing group of employees are self-employed, have work contracts such as part-time and temporary contracts or are employed by a temporary agency, a development catalysed by the COVID pandemic. Whereas there is some evidence that temporary work might affect health via job insecurity (JI )there are hardly any studies focussing on the effects and mechanisms of temporary agency work (TAW). This study sheds light on TAW’s potential health impact and the role of JI in this respect using a mediation analysis. Based on the BIBB/BAuA-Employment Survey 2018 (N = 20.021, representative of the German working population), we analysed the direct effect of TAW on cognitive and psychosomatic aspects of well-being. In particular, we considered JI as mediator for this association. In line with the potentially detrimental effects of temporary employment on well-being, we found that TAW was related to unfavourable outcomes in terms of job satisfaction, general health status and musculoskeletal complaints. JI partially mediated all three underlying associations. Organisations need to be flexible and adaptable. However, by using temporary agency employment as a means to achieve this flexibility, managers and leaders should be aware that it is related to unfavourable well-being and hence hidden costs. In using this type of employment, both the temporary work agency and the user company should consider these health risks by providing health care, options for increasing the temporary agency workers (TA), workers employability, and equal treatment between permanent and TA workers at the actual workplace.

How Does Precarious Employment Affect Mental Health? A Scoping Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence from Western Economies

“…In this review, we deliberately excluded studies focused on subjective job insecurity. However, the included papers nevertheless confirmed (unsurprisingly) that perceived insecurity was a key experience connecting objectively insecure contracts with poor mental health (see also Thomson and Hünefeld, 2021). By examining qualitative evidence, this review was able to add a more fine-grained explanation of the behavioural and relational effects brought about by perceived job insecurity, which lie along the pathway to negative mental health outcomes.…”

What science says about entrepreneurs' well-being: a conceptual structure review

“…Both theoretical and empirical studies focus on health as an interdisciplinary field of research, gaining increasing importance in organizations and extending beyond the psychological, healthcare and medical domains. Job satisfaction, life satisfaction and social relationships are specific constructs of subjective and psychological well-being in entrepreneurship (Saarni et al, 2008;Stephan and Roesler, 2010;Seva et al, 2016;Ryff, 2019;Ha and Kim, 2021;Nikolova et al, 2021;Thomson and Huenefeld, 2021).…”

Precarious employment, precarious life? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of temporary agency workers and their households

“…It has been argued that temporary agency work is particularly prone to precariousness [6]. Temporary agency work tends to be related to high job insecurity [10,11], low wages and few benefits [12,13], unpredictable or irregular schedules [10], poor training opportunities [14], poor employee representation [15,16] and higher chances of unfavourable social relations at work [13,14]. Moreover, the triadic employment relationship involves a higher vulnerability to issues such as withholding mandatory rights, excessive or conflicting demands and problematic health and safety protection [12,15,17].…”