Temporary uses in contemporary spaces. A European project in Rome

Galdini, Rossana

doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102445

Cited by 26 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is fuelled not only by sustainability reasons (see, for example, Ansari et al 2018) but also by the functionality and optimization of the use of urban spaces. The multi-use of buildings and places can easily be coupled with the question of temporary use of buildings and places (see, for example, Bishop and Williams 2012;Blumner 2006;Galdini 2020;Madanipour 2018) in the context of facilitating residents' life under lockdown restrictions.…”

Section: Essential Facilities Quality Of Housing and Human Behaviourmentioning

confidence: 99%

Space and spatial practices in times of confinement. Evidence from three European countries: Austria, France and Poland

Mironowicz

Netsch

Geppert³

2021

Urban Des Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the first half of 2020, millions of people were subjected to drastic restrictions aimed at limiting the spread of the Covid-19 disease. Austria, France and Poland have implemented a lockdown to varying degrees and for varying lengths of time. This is an unprecedented situation in Europe: until now, even in times of war, curfew measures have never been applied 24 h a day. The research presented in this article was carried out in real time, in April and May 2020, with the help of urban planning students from three countries. Its objective is to observe the interaction between these measures and the urban space in two dimensions. On the one hand, we analyse the impact of these measures on the urban space and on the spatial practices of the inhabitants. On the other hand, we examine the conditions which different types of urban and rural space have provided for the inhabitants experiencing confinement. This empirical study leads to a discussion and recommendation for the town planners of the future.

show abstract

Section: Essential Facilities Quality Of Housing and Human Behaviourmentioning

confidence: 99%

Space and spatial practices in times of confinement. Evidence from three European countries: Austria, France and Poland

Mironowicz

Netsch

Geppert³

2021

Urban Des Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, perception of such areas has had to change due to their increasing numbers -the phenomenon triggered among others by: deindustrialisation, globalisation, dominance of neoliberalism (Matoga, 2019;Madanipour, 2017a;Olbińska, 2020), mass media revolution (Ricci, 2017, Olbińska, 2020, urban shrinkage (Honeck, 2017; Wehle-Strzelecka, Strzelecka-Seredyńska, 2021) or suburbanisation (Madanipour, 2017a; Nemeth, Langhorst, 2013; Olbińska, 2020) as well as the economic crisis in 2008 (Martin et al, 2020). In view of foregoing, abandoned structures called for some strategy of recycling and reusing (Galdini, 2020). The increasing awareness of civic societies have resulted in many bottom-up initiatives to activate and revitalise wastelands (Sagan, 2017; Rogatka, 2019;Drozda, 2019;Przywojska, 2016).…”

Section: Tymczasowe Użytkowanie Jako Narzędzie Rewitalizacjimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…dezindustrializacją, globalizacją, dominacją polityki neoliberalnej (Matoga, 2019;Madanipour, 2017a;Olbińska, 2020), rewolucją medialną (Ricci, 2017, Olbińska, 2020, zjawiskiem kurczenia się miast (Honeck, 2017; Wehle-Strzelecka i Strzelecka-Seredyńska, 2021) czy suburbanizacją (Madanipour, 2017a; Nemeth, Langhorst, 2013; Olbińska, 2020) oraz po kryzysie ekonomicznym w 2008 roku (Martin et al, 2020). Sytuacja wymagała strategii recyklingu i ponownego wykorzystania przestrzeni (Galdini, 2020), co przy rosnącej świadomości obywatelskiej mieszkańców doprowadziło do wielu oddolnych inicjatyw aktywizacji pustostanów i tzw. oddolnej rewitalizacji (Sagan, 2017;Rogatka, 2019;Drozda, 2019;Przywojska, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Komercyjne tymczasowe użytkowanie przestrzeni jako narzędzie kreowania współczesnego środowiska mieszkaniowego – szanse i zagrożenia

Kasperczyk

Pazder

2022

Środowisko Mieszkaniowe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tymczasowe użytkowanie to strategia aktywizacji pustostanów i nieużytków stanowiąca interesujące jako prefaza docelowej inwestycji, by wzbudzić zainteresowanie mieszkańców i wykreować atrakcyjny dla potencjalnych klientów wizerunek. Pionierskie w kontekście poznańskim i wciąż mało opisane w kontekście polskim komercyjne tymczasowe użytkowanie przestrzeni może skutkować zarówno pozytywnymi, jak i negatywnymi rezultatami. Celem artykułu jest krytyczna analiza przykładu badawczego Koszar Kultury w Poznaniu w odniesieniu do CREAU – jego wiedeńskiego odpowiednika. Metoda analizy porównawczej, wsparta kwerendą bibliograficzną i wizytą studialną pozwoliły na wskazanie szans i zagrożeń związanych z przeprowadzonym procesem oraz wypracowanie rekomendacji służących kreacji przyjaznego, inkluzywnego środowiska mieszkaniowego w ramach działań rewitalizacyjnych. Commercial temporary use of space as a tool of creating modern housing environment – threats and opportunities Temporary use of space is a strategy of activating the space of abandoned buildings or urban wasteland areas via a variety of bottom-up and top-down initiatives proposed by local communities, municipal authorities and developers. Implemented as a preliminary stage of a target investment project, temporary use of space is intended to spark the interest of the inhabitants and create an attractive image for potential clients. In the area of Poznan, it is a pioneering strategy, that has yet not been thoroughly studied in the Polish context. The strategy entails both positive and negative phenomena. It is the intention of this article to critically analyse a case study of Koszary Kultury [Arts & Culture Baraques] in comparison to a similar initiative in Vienna, i.e. CREAU project. Comparative analysis, combined with a bibliographic query of literature and a site visit, has enabled us to identify opportunities and threats of temporary use of space and to work up recommendations how to create friendly and inclusive residential housing via revitalisation activities.

show abstract

“…Projects are suited to achieve agility and innovation (Prouska & Kapsali, 2020). Projects and business ventures that aim at solving social problems suffer the pressure of getting more done with less, acting in contexts poor in resources and knowledge, where small-scale incremental projects are suited to creating economic value while also addressing social and environmental issues (Galdini, 2020;Malsch & Guieu, 2019). Therefore, this context seems appropriate for the flourishment of projectified logics aiming at solving social problems, some of them related to 'bottom or base of the pyramid' (BoP) issues.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Success Factors, Enablers and Barriers in Social Projects: A Literature Review

Fregolente¹,

Carvalho²

2021

Blucher Engineering Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors conducted a systematic literature review of articles that described projects focused on resolving social issues, frequently associated with the terms base/bottom of the pyramid (BoP), social entrepreneurship and social innovation. Projects are classified accordingly to the source of the idea (top down or bottom up) and the project type (commercial, creative, assistance, collaboration, entrepreneurial or cooperative). They are also compared considering target population, socio-economic context, geography, motivation, critical success factors (CSF), enablers and barriers. The results indicate that most projects are top down, creative or commercial, connected to social innovation or social entrepreneurship approaches, implemented on European countries, aiming at solving local issues related to the management of rural and urban territories, healthcare, education or energy. The themes mostly associated with social projects are territory management and transition to renewable energies. BoP-related projects are almost inexistent, and so are projects aiming at povertyrelated issues. Nonetheless, the CSF encountered in these projects are very similar to the ones reported in BoP literature, mainly including legitimacy with local communities, network building, strategic partnerships, development of local capabilities, and access to resourcesfinancial, technological, human and material.

show abstract

Temporary uses in contemporary spaces. A European project in Rome

Cited by 26 publications

References 7 publications

Space and spatial practices in times of confinement. Evidence from three European countries: Austria, France and Poland

Space and spatial practices in times of confinement. Evidence from three European countries: Austria, France and Poland

Komercyjne tymczasowe użytkowanie przestrzeni jako narzędzie kreowania współczesnego środowiska mieszkaniowego – szanse i zagrożenia

Success Factors, Enablers and Barriers in Social Projects: A Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About