“…For instance, Claeys (, p. 5) laments Owen’s failure “to see that the more formal mechanisms of democracy […] were crucial means of avoiding tyranny in a less than perfect and less than wholly equal world”; Tsuzuki (, p. 43) has described Owen’s ideas about the formation of human character as “a mistake”; and Nagai (, p. 68) has argued that “the mixture or co‐existence of the formative principles of society and the managerial principles of commercial societies” represents a “Fatal theoretical error.” In assessments of the deficiencies of Owen’s socialism in this regard, there is the clear suggestion that flaws were inherent, and the project destined to fail as a result of these inherent flaws. By contrast, recognizing parallels with other similar and significant contributions to the theorization of social transformation makes it possible to develop a reading of Owen that emphasizes the conditions, rather than the limits, of possibility (North, , p. 248; cf. p. 3 above) for cooperative projects and which may contribute to contemporary struggles to realize them.…”